What Pokemon would you remove from the game if you could?
I have nothing against Smeargle's design, but I dislike that it can essentially steal the roles of Pokemon that learn good, rare moves.
>>32757512
yeah because smeargle's totally comparable to breloom or shuckle right
also diggersby
>>32757519
this
fuck diggersby
>>32757512
Hoopa. Its gimmick seems like it should be on Palkia considering Palkia's the master of dimensions or whatever.
>>32757512
Golurk because golurkfags are cancer.
Finneon and Lumineon. Nobody remembers them, their best stat is around 90-100, they're not as memorable as other fish Pokemon and they're an all-round waste of a Pokemon slot.
>>32757519
shouldn't you remove luvdisc
>>32757512
fuck this thing
Chingling is everything I hate about pokemon
>shitty design
>inanimate objectmon
>based on japanese myth/lore/culture
>baby
>>32757779
Pallossand is my waifu
The Nidoran line is honestly the most autism-triggering thing in the entire dex.
>Nidoran will never be retconned into 1 species with gender differences
>doesn't have any clever/creative basis; just a generic rodent except poisonous
>Nidoking and Nidoqueen can't breed
>Nidoking's design is literally just a recolored Rhydon
Literally the only thing it has going for it is the unique Poison/Ground typing, which they could easily just slap onto another mon in future.
>>32758205
Yeah but Nidoqueen has good porn
>>32757512
I just find this thing disturbing in every conceivable way
Most of y'all have garbage taste
Remove Incineroar or Lucario
>>32758281
You truly are a master of bait. A master baiter, if you will.
>>32758223
Get some taste. It may be based on a fetus but it's execution is perfection.