If someone leaked this image and said they were the mascots for the next Pokemon game, would you have believed them?
ha ha i don't know
>>32732493
In an alternate universe, yes.
Yeah, sure, why not? I bought into the Stars rumor after all.
>>32732493
Yes, if only so that people make porn of lunala.
>>32732493
No, but
>It's just like the Kyurem fusions, but less coherent.
Also
>Prism Armor
>Necrozma is the armor.
im so glad i didnt bought SM
i knew i should have waited for the third version
and it paid off
>>32732614
>less coherent
But Kyurem's designs are much worse than these.
On the one hand, there have been a lot of leaks the last few years, so i probably would consider it.
And it's not like your average faker would come up with necrozma mix and actually expect people to believe it
On the other hand, it's a real stretch to believe this on barely anything
I'd probably just let it be until someone came up with good evidence one way or the other
i would believe it because it's the kind of wrong shit game freak pulls off its ass everytime
>>32733595
You and me both, brother
I told people they wouldn't drop out of 3DS just yet, and they just responded "but they have to now that Switch is here".
"but they can't jump console in the middle of a generation"
"Why not?"
"Because then you couldn't trade between the two installments that are the same generation"
"so?"
>>32733618
Good joke, 7/10 made me chuckle.
>>32732493
Nobody would believe it. Not even those itt that pretends they would. It's such an objectively dumb and random concept that on one would buy it unless it's from Gamefreak themselves.
>>32732493
nah
>>32732614
They're not armor. They're both Necrozma. You can't see Cosmoem because Necrozma is taking its place. These are Necrozma Forms only. Screencap this.
The form would make sense to me, kind of when the starters evolutions leaked. But I would still consider them as fake until they would be confirmed by the official websiteor Mallow
>>32732493
i'd believe the concept, but not the design