>$40 for ""brand new game"" (dlc)
>its not even on switch
L M A O
And you fags will eat this shit up
>Tfw you will still buy it cause it's pokemon
>>32685461
>implying I will pay a cent for it
It should have been DLC.
All the more proof SM were rushed out of production for "mah 20th anniversary" BS.
IT'S OK WHEN NINTENDO DOES IT
>>32685461
>current year
>paying for games
Nah, I'm not buying them.
Enjoy your worst selling main line game.
>>32685461
why would it be on a console
I didn't waste money on SM. So yes, I an eating this up.