Pokemon you like that just aren't very good in competitive.

>>32546468
This thing has such weird fucking stats. I love gen 3 but why do most of the things there have wonky stats?

>>32546483
None of its stats really reflect the Pokemon itself. I'm not saying give it great stats across the board, but at least put its defensive stats at somewhere over 100

>>32546468
I like it from the chest up. But the legs and feet are so blobby and stubby it puts me off.

>slow mixed attacker with inadequate bulk
There, just described every Pokémon that will be posted ITT, most of which are from Gen III

File: miltank.jpg (376KB, 1438x893px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1438x893px

>>32546468
>tfw all your favorite Pokemon are shit in competitive

Great taste OP, Tropius is one of my all time favorites. Nothing can beat Milly though.

>>32546468
>2017
>Tropius still doesn't have a tail

File: 1476296925524.png (97KB, 350x345px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 350x345px

>>32548912
You're not wrong.
At least Boomburst helped a bit.

File: 528___swoobat_by_combo89-dai5sue.png (356KB, 812x812px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 812x812px

>>32548912
boop

>tfw Ledian will never even be decent in competitive.
I'm not asking for OU viability, I'd be perfectly fine with NU viability. I understand not every Pokemon will be "good" per chance, but since the removal of the mini and sidegames, Ledian has zero use within the game unless you're a masochist.