>we are in generation 7
>scald's burn chance isn't nerfed to 20%
>regenerator isn't nerfed down to 25%
>knock off is still the EXACT fucking same as last gen
>>32508809
it's almost as if Nintendo don't balance their game around a 3rd parties version of competitive battling
>>32508809
to be fair, the introduction of z items did put a strain on knock off.
>>32508809
There is literally nothing overpowered about Scald, Regenerator or Knock Off unless you're some kind of a subhuman troglodyte who plays singles and thinks that singles are meant for competitive play.
>>32508809
cry more you dumb frogposter
>>32508862
>scald
over distributed move that has more than a 1/4 chance to half attack and chip down health
>Regenerator
Oh you used toxic well fuck you
>knock off
When paired with a dark type with a high attack stat it effectively has a power of 130 .
>>32508809
Fuck off you faggot, thanks to people like you Thunderbolt/Ice Beam/Flamethrower and Blizzard/Fire Blast/Thunder are FUCKING USELESS.
>>32508922
Actually they are still pretty useful. It offers more diversity. I mean there are the more powerful and risky moves then there are the less powerful but much more safe moves.
>>32508809
>Perfect Zygarde isn't permanent
>tfw Water types are better at burning than Fire types
>>32508809
>Still bitching about scald in tapus:the meta
>>32508815
Nintendo has nothing to do with Pokemon's development.
>>32508809
The burn nerf is their way to nerf Scald. Stuff like Latios who struggled to switch into Scald before now do so a lot more comfortably. Also, there is a Tapu which can shut down the burn chance for 5 turns and is easy to fit into teams.
Similarly, Knock Off has been indirectly nerfed by the introduction of Z-Crystals, although it is a smaller nerf than Scald/burns.
You sorta have a point with Regenerator, but it is only a relative problem in singles. One should wonder instead why they haven't nerfed Intimidate, since that is the ability that is actually somewhat of an issue in doubles.