It is said that Pokémon will be rebootet in one way or another,

Hopefully a reboot will also retcon most Pokemon in the series, ideally the least popular lines.

>>32162265
Especially all the Bara, Waifu and Furshits.

>>32162254
Isn't it funny how we got an actual Ghost Fighting type?

>>32162270
most pokemon not all pokemon

>>32162254
>It is said that Pokémon will be rebootet in one way or another

By fucking who nigger?

>>32162254
They'be been rebooting the serie since Ruby and Sapphire.

>>32162275
You can't tell me you want to keep autistic bullshit like Lucario, Incineroar, Gardevoir, Primarina, Zoroark, Salazzle etc., right? Those all deserve to be banished out of existence, regardless of popularity.

>>32162296
>Those Pokemon's fanbase are cancer so they deserve to be retconned
Don't let your taste being influenced by other people. Lucario was fine for everybody before furries came

File: 1471983366968.png (11KB, 362x135px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 362x135px

>>32162254

>>32162314
But their designs are shit aswell.
To that comes that Incineroar, Primarina, Zoroark and Salazzle are also not popular. Lucario and Gardevoir might be shilled aswell, but I have never seen anyone like it for reason other than being a edgelord or furry. Removing any of these designs won't make them lose anything of value, I bet most people would even thank them for doing so.

>>32162344
>but I have never seen anyone like it for reason other than being a edgelord or furry.
Lots of kids love Lucario to be honest, that's pretty much why it has been marketed to death, that's why we've got so much Lucario dick sucking in XY for example.
Lucario is pretty much as popular as Charizard and Pikachu by now, at least for the kids that grew up with gen IV and beyond
Plus the design isn't all that bad, it's far from the best but it's far from the worst human-like pokemon to exist

>>32162254
If it's a reboot then retain them all

>>32162322
I unironically like this design

>>32162254
All the odd numbered generations have been a soft reboot

>>32162254
At least the national pokedex will finally be arranged properly.

I wouldn't mind if they completely redid most Pokemon's stats and movepools.

>>32162476
If GF for some reason introduced a brand new stat in a future generation, they would have no choice but to do that. The stats part at the very least.

>>32162344
>but I have never seen anyone like it for reason other than being a edgelord or furry
Ok, lets take out everything that edgelords and furry likes
>Bye glaceon and many other eeveelutions, have you seen how many furry porn those have!?
>Bye garchomp, A.K.A. the edgelord choice, i still remember how you beheaded that fucker in that edgy fangame
>Bye weavile, you were both an edgelord and a furry bait
>Bye Machamp, you fucking barabait
>Bye Zangoose, you were such a fucking huge furrybait that you got your own day
How are you feeling about these being removed?

>>32162254
they already tried with BW it didn't work and people bitch and moaned because they couldn't use their bros

>>32162485
Good. None of those had a right to exist in the first place.

>>32162485
>remove waifus
>no more mawile
>no more absol
>no more liligant
>no more toxapex
This isn't the future I wanted

>>32162508
>remove waifus
>no more toxapex
I didn't know people wanted to fuck the tiny head inside the spiky walls

/vp/ sure knows how to make already terrible threads worse.

>>32162296
>>32162344
>Am I fitting in: the posts

>>32162254
Three points:

1. There will be no reboot.
2. If there was, no Pokémon would be removed from the series.
3. Removing any Pokémon from the series is an asinine idea, and anyone who suggests it should be ashamed of their stupidity.

>>32162542
Removing filler and useless fluff is the opposite of asinine.

For example if they removed the Flygon line, there would, at worst, be two or three vocal assholes crying about it. And then they would get over it and nobody would miss it.

>>32162553
There is no reason to remove any Pokémon. Literally none. To use your dubious example, nobody is harmed or inconvenienced in any way by Flygon remaining in the game, even if only your three hypothetical players use it. Nobody benefits from it being removed.

>>32162584
We benefit from the Flygon line being removed by GF not having to waste any resources on updating it anymore for future generations, and thus GF can use development time on anything else.

Flygon is the literal definition of useless and wasted data.

>>32162254
Pokémon Go is the reboot.
From now onwards, every new Pokémon announced will be referred as a "Pokémon Go". The next generations will feature you as a Pokémon Go Trainer who catches wild Pokémon Go and becomes champion of the Pokémon Go league.

>>32162523
I've heard claims of anons jacking off to math equations, floor tiles, and the state of Ohio. At this point I shouldn't really be surprised, but damn if this place doesn't keep surpassing my expectations.

If Pokemon were removed from games I'd quit the series plain and simple.

I never got into the Digimon series because the ones that appealed to me (Bucchiemon and Mikemon) never appeared in the interesting games so I know how annoying it is to never be able to use your favorite.

>>32162608

I can't tell if you're legitimately stupid or just successfully pretending to be, so congratulations on that, I guess?

>>32162553
you must be retarded, like brain dead retarded.
removing pokemon makes less variety, what if i want a dragon ground pokemon but i don't like garchomp?, i literally have no other option if flygon gets removed
>>32162608
>GF not having to waste any resources on updating it anymore for future generations, and thus GF can use development time on anything else.
they've been reusing pokemon models this past few games, and the models are already made to be used in consoles, removing pokemon now is just throwing effort to the garbage bin.

>>32162584
>There is no reason to remove any Pokémon. Literally none.
removing old Pokémon means more room for new Pokémon and new features as a whole. If they cut all the useless filler (like Luvdisc or Amomola), they'd have room for grand things such as a second-region postgame or 200-300 new Pokémon.

>>32162499
Machamp was never barabait. Machoke has maybe triple the porn and other forced bara like Charizard and Nidoking have more art. Leave my bro out of this you autistic fuck

>>32162584
Removing Pokemon would bring in former fans who's annoyed with how many Pokemon there are. They would be EXTREMELY happy to not have to catch as many Pokemon.

In other words, removing Pokemon that's filler, useless, unpopular and/or hated would be great for Gamefreak's business, since sales would skyrocket up to Red/Blue levels of success.

File: rolls.gif (2MB, 450x337px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 450x337px

>>32162760
>They would be EXTREMELY happy to not have to catch as many Pokemon.

You don't have to catch them and there isn't even a national dex in SM.

Next

>>32162760
>You know what I hate about Pokémon? There's too much game. I wish there was less to do. Maybe if the developers put less in there, it would take up less of my time and I'd buy it. Right now it's just too much content to be worth my money.

...said literally nobody ever.

>>32162427
pretty true tbqh

>>32162717
Can you provide any evidence for the assertion that the games are at the data limit of the cartridge, and that the reason there aren't more new Pokémon is because of the presence of old Pokémon? Without a source on this, you're engaging in baseless speculation.

File: zelda bait.jpg (168KB, 1372x767px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1372x767px

>32162717
>removing old Pokémon means more room for new Pokémon and new features as a whole.
t. retard who doesn't know shit
>32162760
ok, your bait is becoming stale real fast

people who thinks that any Pokémon would be removed in a hypothetical reboot are either blind or retarded.
Haven't you guys noticed that incident last year where the names of some Pokémon were changed in China because of the former upcoming games having their language included? And what was the result? Exactly,a crowd of people were infuriated because of that.Now just imagine the level of rage that TPC would receive if they just got rid off some amount of mons. Definitely not the best thing to do in revenue terms

>>32162873
Which ones were those?

>>32162799
Sun and Moon were considerably larger than any previous games in terms of raw bytes. They probably aren't at full capacity yet, but they most likely will be in a couple gens time. Someday they will need to reboot and we'll all have to be okay with it. Personally, I think the only reason they removed the national dex in Sun and Moon was to help prepare us.

>>32162633
Whatever happened to floor tile anon, anyway?

>>32163064
>Sun and Moon were considerably larger than any previous games in terms of raw bytes. They probably aren't at full capacity yet, but they most likely will be in a couple gens time. Someday they will need to reboot and we'll all have to be okay with it. Personally, I think the only reason they removed the national dex in Sun and Moon was to help prepare us.

Ah yes, it's a shame that we're stuck at our current level, and that memory capacity isn't something that increases pretty steadily with time.

plus, Sun/Moon didn't add nearly enough new pokemon for the number of pokemon to be the significant factor here. even if you include alolan forms, you're looking at maybe a hundred, which is about 114% of what ORAS had.

more likely, the increased size was related to graphics and engine changes.

>>32163091
>you're looking at maybe a hundred, which is about 114% of what ORAS had.

slight correction: maybe a hundred more.

and that 114% doesn't hold if you include various pre-gen-VII forms anyway.

File: lockstin_fail.png (38KB, 196x110px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 196x110px

>>32162254
>it is said
OH SHIT LOOK IT IS SAID SO THAT MAKES IT TRUE!!!

>>32162980
Sun and Moon

>>32162873
>people angry at having localized names
Fuck them. My pokemon nicknames are based entirely on their species name in other languages. Looking at you Spain and Italy, you lazy fucks.

File: thinking.jpg (26KB, 600x337px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x337px

>>32163064
>>32163091
>Sun and Moon were considerably larger than any previous games in terms of raw bytes.
>more likely, the increased size was related to graphics and engine changes.
Wasn't almost half of the space wasted in ''cutscenes''?

>>32163073
Nobody knows.

File: Newspaper-Dad-Charizard-Meme-Is-Not-Amused.jpg (163KB, 1229x1031px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1229x1031px

>>32162265

>>32163175

quite possibly.

my point was that the size increase isn't from the new pokemon.

>>32163189
is there even a limit for how big the games for 3ds can be?, i heard the biggest one is like almost 4 GB, but SD cards can easily go far beyond that.

>>32163220
as far as I can tell, the cartridges for the 3DS have a capacity of 8gb

some of that is reserved for save data though.

obviously, you could make a bigger game, but I expect they'd want to avoid digital only titles for now.

but by the time we're hitting 8 gig, we'll be on new hardware with new limits.

>>32162760
you're a moron

>>32163162
The game titles were changed?

>>32162254
but pokemon did already have a reboot
it's called pokemon black and white

>>32162274
Too bad it has a shit ability

>>32162254
Marshadow

>>32162254
No, what Sun and Moon did(wrong IMO but lets stay as objective as possible) was give a way for new players to easily fill the dex without actually doing it while still keeping the old mons around for older ones.

If it really was a reboot then the old mons wouldn't show up period, and not only are they in game data and can be transferred, but also there's Ash-Greninja, not part of the Alolan dex, and mons like Charizard as ride mons who aren't there either.

If there's gonna be a reboot somewhere down the line I don't think Sun and Moon are the start of it. Whether there is a reboot remains to be seen. Do keep in mind that one of the biggest actual complaints about Gen 3 was them not transfering Gen 2 mons over. Not only they never did that again but implemented in Gen 6 a system to solve that issue for good. They wont drop that early. I'd say we're guaranteed at least 10 more years without a reboot.

>>32162265
>Hopefully
Back to 9fag.

>>32162427
Not even close to the way OP means it though.

>>32162451
Depends on how they handle it. The reason its not arranged properly is because they introduce cross gen evos so taht should stop in order to get a properly arranged dex.

>>32162495
Black and White had all previous mons available and allowed for transfer from Gen 4.

>>32162553
>Removing filler and useless fluff is the opposite of asinine.
Pokemon have more than one reason for existing. Some might not appeal to you but appeal to others.

>>32162608
twitching movesets a bit doesn't take that much work.

>>32162635
Yeah, something I like about pokemon over digimon is that, even taking into account our complaints about, say, the national dex or Nidoran, the lore is more consistent and the mons have a neater classification.

>>32162717
This isn't Gen 2 anymore anon, mon amount means shit. It's probably one of the lesser optimization issues.

>>32162760
> former fans who's annoyed with how many Pokemon there are
nostalgiafags don't count as fans.

>They would be EXTREMELY happy to not have to catch as many Pokemon.
>I want less to collect on a franchise that's literally about collecting

>>32163064
>Sun and Moon were considerably larger than any previous games in terms of raw bytes.
Yet they have, data-wise, only about 100 more mons than Gen 6. Mons mean shit anon.