describe the pokemon deigns for each gen >gen I classic,

>>32160816
>Generation I
Animalistic monsters, with realistic features and design with just the right amount of fantasy mixed in.

>Generation II
Tried to be Generation I, didn't come out as strongly.

>Generation III
No longer as animalistic, rather trying to make different and unique monsters.

>Generation IV
Trying too hard with some, too little with others.

>Generation V
Taking previous ideas, tried making them more appealing. Too many filler Pokemon.

>Generation VI
Mixed Generation III and V, without unnecessary filler Pokemon.

>Generation VII
Continuing on Generation VI's way, but now a bit more experimental with its designs.

>>32160816
>deigns

>>32160816
>attempted reboot
I wouldn't call it a reboot. Rather, they tried to give the impression that Unova was so far away from Kanto and the rest that it had a whole new set of Pokemon, with none of the previous ones being found here.

File: PokemonByGen.png (397KB, 1785x243px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1785x243px

>>32160816
>gen I
generic but realistic
>gen II
cute and toy-like
>gen III
cool and unusual but also slightly lazy at times
>gen IV
so edgy you'll cut yourself looking at it
>gen V
quirky; lots of objectmons
>gen VI
big heads on little bodies but generally really good designs
>gen VII
some hilarious designs but way too much waifushit