>Ugly character models (they're extremely jagged and look they belong in an N64 game)
>Old Pokemon models are ripped straight from Stadium which makes them look jarring compared to the much better looking Gen 3 Pokemon models
>Attack animations are also worse than the Stadium games
>Long animations + every battle being a double battle means battles take forever
I can't believe I ever liked this game,
The music was really good.
>>31998785
>>31998767
/thread
>>31998767
>m-muh grafix muh animations
You should probably stop playing video games.
>>31998767
>battles take forever
only if you're shit at video games, which isn't surprising since you browse /vp/
>>31998767
Imma start a play-through of this shit this week.
It's admittedly slow, but I think its legit.
I mean, it does have the best music in the franchise.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zis62ZmpMJM
>>31998767
And yet it still looks better than Gen 6. That's pretty sad.
>>31999033
No, Colosseum actually looks worse than Gen 6 graphically by a large margin. At least in the areas that matter most.
>>31999042
Like what? Every town in Colosseum looks better, the Pokemon models are pretty bad, but most of them are from Pokémon Stadium. I can agree that some of the NPCs look pretty bad though. Those gigantic feet and eyes.
>>31999042
Okay but when you first played it as a kid it was amazing. It was like those little sprites from your handheld came to life right before your eyes. It was amazing, and it's still good if you appreciate it for what it is. Don't expect the graphics to improve as you age, it's still the same game from years ago.
jumpluffs shadow were awesome in colosseum
>>31999042
The only thing that looks better from Gen 6 are the Pokemon models.
>A 14 year old game looks like shit
Who is this dipshit OP.
>>31999450
>a 14 year old game looks better than the current mainline