Remember when we had these to pick from?
Inspired, realistic designs that allowed the player to be captivated be all the possibilities that Pokémon had to offer.
>>31745768
Now we have THESE abominations!
Why the hell are all of them lizards? A frog with a tree on its back? A literal dragon? A Digimon turtle colored blue?
I feel sorry for the youth of today.
>>31745768
Garbage
>>31745768
>Charmander's snout has gotten more smoothed out as time goes on
>tfw it's a flat-faced freak now
A legitimate case of new designs being worse, and people don't even seem to notice.
>>31746296
They don't notice because "old" Charmander lasted a single year of life. Anime Charmander was already like that. "New" my ass.
>>31745773
>Why the hell are all of them lizards
They aren't.
>A frog with a tree on its back
Not much different from a frog with a flower bud.
>A literal dragon?
As opposed to a standing lizard.
>A Digimon turtle colored blue?
Not much different from just a blue turtle.
>>31745768
Remember Pokemon?
IT WAS A GOOD GAME!
>>31745768
Bulbasaur: eat this seed bro
Squirtle: don't wanna
Charmander: I want one