>generation 8 introduces 98 new pokémon (total: 900)
>gen 9 introduces 100 (total: 1000)
>gen 10 introduces 1 new legendary (1001; as a parallel to 151), and they are the final pokémon games, concluding the pokémon series.
Would you be okay with this?
>>31677829
>gen 9 not introducing 99 pokemon
Wrong. GF will never let a gen have a number of pokemon divisible by 10.
>>31677829
>and they are the final pokémon games, concluding the pokémon series.
>Would you be okay with this?
No
>>31677836
Fuck I'm stupid.
Those numbers are just a made up guideline. The only other real option is to split 200 into three parts, with about 65 pokémon for the next three gens, but I don't want that.
Point of the thread is just meant to be, "should generation 10 conclude the pokémon franchise".
>>31677894
Pokémon should never end
>>31677862
You mean like Gen 2?
>>31677829
>/vp/ is finally deleted
Praise
>>31677916
251?
>>31677829
>implying gf will ever let Pokemon die with dignity and won't keep spitting out games until it's a rotting corpse on par with sonic the hedgehog
At least capcom had the good graces to let megaman die instead of dragging its mutilated corpse through the street