Isn't it cruel to evolve paras? You're effectively killing paras and giving the fungus full control. Shouldn't there be some procedure before evolving them?
>>31601124
Not as cruel as butchering her colors in gens 5 and 6.
>muh official art
Every other medium showed the superior bright red, including the TCG.
>>31601132
>her
Paras evolves by level up to some extent, Parasect can appear as a Wild Pokemon. You are accelerating an inevitable natural phenomenon.
>>31601141
50% female
>>31601124
>what is symbiosis
>>31601162
Okay, I didn't ask the gender ratio. If you saw a baby would you just say "her"?
>>31601172
I call everyone she/her, so yes.
>owning a paras in the first place
>>31601124
the pokemon is the fungus
the body is a host
>>31601234
It's like Dhelmise, where the sea weed is the mon, not the anchor.
>>31601148
Level Paras up to 100 without letting it evolve.
That's the only way to save it.
>>31601502
The only difference is that the anchor was never alive to begin with.
>>31601690
Is any of us?
>>31601124
What if Paras & Parasect IS the fungus & the parasite it's attached to is something else?
>>31601783
That's deep
Why doesn't anyone respect the mushroom?
>muh bug is being manipulated
Yeah well if it was so great it wouldn't have been parasitized
>>31601231
How else are you supposed to catch em all, faggot?
Paras is horrible, but they are a necessity in order to keep the shiitonic at bay. It's either parasitic mushrooms or fae mushrooms.
>>31601783
Some anchors are.
>no alolan form non-mushroom paras
>>31601124
what if the paras just shed its shell?
>>31603418
>It's a psuedo with ridiculous speed and attack, so savage it has canonically destroyed entire cities.
>The fungus is saving us from the beastly 'mon.
>>31603418
We already have the Hoenn form non-mushroom paras.