>Wouldn't have been allowed in VGC
>Wouldn't have been allowed in Battlespots
>Wouldn't have been allowed on Showdown except AG
Why did people want Fissure Machamp again?
because le epic maymay
>>31524603
battle tree
>>31524603
Because Machamp needed it desperately, the right kind of buff that would have saved him from being unviable.
>>31524607
Just inject it lol?
>>31524669
Again, where would have it been viable? If you needed one this badly for the Tree just inject an illegal one, it's not like you wouldn't have done that anyway for a perfect IV/Nature, let's not kid ourselves
>>31524603
>Wouldn't have been allowed in VGC
Not this year. Next year it would've been because that's when Power-Up Punch Kangaskahn and Landorus would've been legal.
>>31524773
Battle spot?
>>31524791
VGC only allows pokemon born/caught in Alola