This is the reason why current mons won't ever get new evolutions.

>>31395802
N E R F
E
R
F

I T
T

>>31395802
>Like OP went full autistic

Just inject lol

>>31395802
Sylveon is a new evolution to an old Pokemon, introduced after Eviolite.
What's stopping more split evolutions from being made?

>>31395904
Split evolutions are boring stinky smelly filthy and lame.

Cross gen evos for shitmons or gtfo.

>>31395904
Because Eevee already had evolutions

>>31396719
his post and question were stupid, but that doesn't answer it.

I'm pretty sure that isnt the reason why. If it was, they wouldn't make pre-evos with good defensive stats like Type:Null now, but they are.

>>31395904
That was solely made to market Fairy types, and you know it. Hence why the only made one, and didn't make it a Fairy-Dragon pair, just like how all other new eeveelutions are released in pairs.

Honest question, what NEEDS a crossgen evo?

>>31395802
Can't gamefreak just give an evolution to a mon that would still be awful either way? Aipom, for instance, got a cross-gen evo and now both of them are shitmons ;_;

>>31396757
The terrible non-evolving ones (e.g. Spinda, Maractus, Farfetch'd)

>eviolite now only adds 1.3 defenses to second stage mons in three-stage/first in two-stage
>1.5 to first in three-stage
better?

>>31396799
Unless Eviolite doubles baby pokemon stats, I don't give a fuck.

>>31395802
implying we want more evolutions

Because every Pokemon is supposed to have a final evolution

>eviolite is now affected by number of possible evolutions this pokemon can have in total, think Wurmple and Eevee
how's that?

>>31396898
That's a way too big buff for Eevee.

>>31395802
Extremely satisfied actually.

Prediction evos are hot garbage, full evos can be a contrived mess that sends the base form into obscurity, at least Megas make you carry the base form.

>>31396781
>Ambipom
>shitmon