LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO POKEMON WASN'T

>80 titles in development
>no mentioned
Dumb stupid generic Hawaiian girlposters

>>31360715

Yeah, but damn, Zelda looks good.

>>31361053
In selling my stocks in salt because we just hit a market high abundance from starfags

>>31360715
Being a denialfag has never felt so satisfying.

>>31361078
>falling for obvious bait and switch

>>31361053
they showed the developers(big ones) that were working on said games, youd think GF would be on there.

>>31360715
Just fuck my launch titles up famalam

>>31361156

Gamefreak isn't a true third-party developer. Less need to tout their involvement, because it's assumed.

>>31361173
yea im taking notes

next time i release a system i wont tell anyone that the franchise that could sell about half of the consoles is developing a game for it

>>31360715
when has pokemon ever been a lauch title for anything

>people unironically believed Nintendo would risk consumer confidence in their second highest earning title by announcing a new main line game mere months after the last release

It's not denial. It's called sensibility.

>>31361357

Agreed. Whether Stars exists or not, it would be idiotic to announce it now. It would do nothing but piss off the millions of people who bought SM two months earlier.

>>31361173
>because it's assured

Such delusion.

Most it'll get is a Stadium/Pokken game or some other spin-off.

>>31361449

...I don't disagree. I'm not saying "Stars exists!" Just that there's no need to say "look at our third-party support, Gamefreak is working on a Switch game!" Because it's Gamefreak, not a true third-party.

(Also, you misquoted me. I said "assumed," not "assured.")

>need to pay to trade/battle online
no thanks, I'll stick to my sinking ship

>>31361238
stay salty you fucking child