> Tapus, Ultra Beasts, Legendaries, and Toxapex are the only

I thought Mimikyu was in OU?

>>31031050
Basically following the trend set by Gen 6

Singles is beyond saving now.

File: 1481983197852.jpg (113KB, 610x481px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 610x481px

> Tapus, Ultra Beasts, Legendaries
>It's a 'Tapu and Ultra Beasts aren't Legendaries' episode

>>31031469
They're not.

>>31031050
What is marowak
What is mimikyu
What is ashninja
What is zyguarde 2.0 and zydog

I hear Golisopod and Decidueye are pretty decent

>>31031477
(You)

Garchomp

G A R C H O M P

>>31031686
>zyguarde 2.0
Banned in OU unless you mean Zygarde with unreleased Gen 6 moves.

>>31031050
Tapus are legendaries afaik.

>>31031686
>What is marowak
>What is ashninja
Not new Pokemon depending on who you ask. Especially ashninja.

>What is zyguarde 2.0 and zydog
Legendaries.

>>31031903
>being in denial so hard you're blacklisted from ou viability threads
Topu Keko

File: 1445583052830.jpg (23KB, 186x271px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 186x271px

>>31031992
>new pokemon
Do you have reading deficiencies or just pretending to be retarded?

>>31032140
>Alolan Marowak
>not a new Pokemon
what

>>31032225
Marowak is a Gen 1 Pokemon. So it's not new.

File: Leave Tapus and UBs to me.jpg (102KB, 852x938px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 852x938px

>implying tapus and UBs are the shit

>>31032251
but what about ALOLAN Marowak

the ALOLA FORM of Marowak

a completely different type, movepool, and abilities from regular Marowak?

It may not technically be a new Pokemon, but you can't deny that it's very different

Mimikyu is an absolute beast

A-Marowak is technically a new Pokemon with it's new typing and stats, so count that

Also don't forget about Magearna who eats Lele for breakfast

I can see Minior, Ribombee, and Lycanroc having their niche in UU

Oranguru is an excellent doubles mon at least

Stop being sheep and following smogon

>>31031469
while they're technically legendary, they're still a distinct sub-group notable enough to be listed on it's own.

>>31032294
Not a new mon because no new dex entry xxd

Wasn't Primarina placed in OU?

List of SM pokemon that are good or at least have a usable niche in OU, and are not tapus/UBs/legends:
>Toxapex
>Mimikyu
>Alola Marowak, Muk, and Ninetales
>Primarina
>Inciniroar (once HA is released, maybe)
>Bewear
>Pyukumuku (very niche)

List of old pokemon that are viable due to buffs
>Pelipper
>Torkoal
>Mantine

This is about all I can recall.

>>31032464
Things don't get "placed" in OU, tiers are determined by usage. Primarina won't be OU, but it will be viable in OU.

>>31032294
Forms aren't Pokemon. They're forms. It's just an addition to an old species, of Pokemon. It doesn't make it a new Pokemon.

>but you can't deny that it's very different
no or they'd actually let me use Alolan Marowak and Kanto Marowak together in the same team on VGC/Battle Spot.

>>31032464
no

Toxapex is literally the only new Pokemon that isn't a UB or Tapu that's worth a shit in OU

>>31032225
I'm the anon you responded to.

Alolan Marowak may not be considered new by the simple fact it is remade Kanto Marowak. Basically what >>31032294 said. Different but not new.

>>31032503
When I saw Pelipper getting Drizzle I laughed at the idea of wallbreaker pelican.

>>31032352
>listed on its own

Listed where? They aren't distinguished from legends in anything. When you filter the GTS by "legends and mythicals," it filters tapus and UBs. They're the same class.

File: kommo-o.png (175KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 500x500px

Apologize.

when I get shell smash in stars

>>31033086
epic black surprise box bro

>>31032503
>incineroar
Being this deep in denial. Even owlfag is better

>>31033086
>still no physical fighting stab though
Still not viable

File: Sylveon.full.1431982-1024.jpg (242KB, 930x930px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 930x930px

>>31033086
What were you saying?

>>31032710
>Listed where?

Battle Royale.

>>31033372
Incineroar is a bulkier arcanine with better stab. You are delusional if you think owl is better