Why can't Nidoqueen (and Nidorina) BREED?
It's been over four years.
What explanation could GameFreaks possibly have?
>>30813514
Nidoqueen is the best pokemilf
they can breed
>>30813514
Menopause
>>30813514
She's saving herself for marriage.
>>30813514
Private parts fall off.
>>30813514
>It's been over four years
Try over 16 years
They probably fucked up some coding in Gold and Silver and kept it consistent since Masuda's an autistic faggot who has issues retconning anything
For as much Gen II did right it still had issues
>>30813514
Breed nidoking with female nidoran. young pussy.
It just blows my fucking mind, this little SLUT can squeeze a million eggs out of her cooch.
But the only Pokemon with TITTIES cannot.
RIP my dream of Beast Ball Nidoqueen
>>30813635
>Beast Ball Nidoqueen
How would you get one even if they could breed?
>>30813576
>Has issues retconning anything
There have been tons of retcons in Pokemon. Storywise there are canon alternate universes where events occurred differently than presented, physiology wise certain Pokemon have inexplicably changed type and have just "Been that way forever, now"
>>30813813
Oddly, though, they've never retconned anything related to breeding. Even when they've introduced new baby versions of other pokemon that didn't have them before, those pokemon still give birth to adult versions unless they're holding a specific incense or something. I don't know why they do that, but that's just the way it is.
>>30813813
>Storywise
Game Freak's writing is utter shit, they can drop any plot points and nobody would give a fuck unless it's XY-tier terrible. I'm talking gameplay retcons because they have so much legacy shit that needs to be dropped. So many items and unnecessary bloat is added to the game's code because it's like a student programmer learning they can do a new thing and adding that into the game without thinking about having to do it every single time in the future to remain 'consistent'
Some things need to change, and abilities+stat buffs are a step in the right direction
>>30813514
the funniest thing about this is that they are only fertile when they are infants.
>>30813514
>over four years
You realize it's been that way since GS, right?
>>30814070
I think the OP meant generations.
>>30813907
probably because babies were a mistake
they can remove incenses if they want, just as long as they give babies the ability to breed., There is no reason for Munchlax and Mantyke to be unale to breed but Bulbasaur and Swinub can.
>>30813813
He probably means retcons related to game mechanics. Like >>30813907 and also if it's a new evolution it has to be a new method or a new move they couldn't learn before. For example they didn't make it so Golbat evolves into Crobat at level 40 or something, because you could raise a Golbat to level 40 in the first generation and nothing would happen.
>>30815550
Anyone who hates baby Pokemon is an entitled manbaby
Menopause
MENOPAUSE
It's a hard fact of reality that women can't have babies after a certain age (and really the decade prior to that is also not a great time to have kids either).
>>30815668
Babies add literally nothing to the game but the opportunity for some moves their evolutions don't get and even then often times the moves aren't worth it
They need retooling so people don't hate them as much. They take away more than they add
>Nidoking and Nidoqueen can't breed
>but Nidoking can breed with Nidoran female and Nidoqueen can breed with Nidoran male
what is this logic
>>30815925
>Nidoqueen can breed with Nidoran male
False. Nidoqueen and even Nidorina are straight incapable of being bred with anything. Even Ditto
They want Nidoqueen for themselves.
>>30813514
Because japan loves pointless complexity.