Does this count as the first poison legendary? Are they considered

>>30751566
yea

>>30751566
They aren't legendaries, unfortunately, so no.

>>30751589
They are sub-Legendaries, so yes it counts.

>>30751566
>>30751585
>Ultra Beasts
>Legendary
We see at least 8 Nihilego in the Ultra Dimension, and it's treated as just another pokémon.

The Ultra Beasts aren't treated as unique creatures at all, rather species of invaders from another dimension.

it counts to me
it should count to you too

>>30751589
>Because I say so

Their stats and dex position leaves them as legendaries.
Just a new kind of legendaries.

>>30751589
That's the same as telling that Mythical Pokémon don't count either as they are not called Legendary Pokémon, you fucking idiot.

Nihilego counts as our first Poison "Legendary", yeah.

Does Nanu count as the first Dark type gym leader?

>>30751566
Yes and Yes

>>30751634
No.

>>30751608
>small, limited number catchable per game
>BST on par with Tapus
>can't breed
Lorewise they might not be legendary, but mechanically they are

File: 60109398_p0.jpg (464KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 2048x1536px

The answer is yes to both.

Internally the game rounds up all the special Pokemon and assigns them to the "Legendary" or "Sublegendary" category. This is used for things like Pokedex colors, GTS filtering, and ban lists.

The Ultra Beasts, Tapus, and Type: Null/Silvally are all categorized as sublegendaries alongside things like the Birds and Genies.

>>30751660
>tfw gen 7 blurs the line of legendaries and "gym leaders" so much that Nihilego and Nanu aren't as special as they should be for what they are type-wise
How confusing. Here's hoping gen 8 actually solidifies this more.