>Be legitimate, good boy player
>Want to give cool pokemon I bred to new trainers
>Someone disconnects
>Banned for up to 72 hours
>Be hacker
>Shart 60 identical Shiny 6IV Milotics all named PEINUS into the world
>Banned
>Reset save in under two minutes
>Resume
And I mean, I'm saying this as the second guy, but who the hell thought this was a good idea? I'm gonna feel so bad for all the little kids on Christmas who get fucking rekt by people purposefully DC'ing to fuck with them and ruin their Wonder Trades.I don't actually name them that, but y'know, I could.
Rouge will never bounce her fat bat ass up and down your hard cock
>>30745946
How hard would it have been to just temp. ban only the player who disconnected?
>>30745946
>Sonic
Opinion discarded.
>>30745990
Too hard for Nintendies, apparently
>>30746004
>using reaction images as a basis of someone's likes
back to >>>/a/ with you I've never even played Sonic
>>30745990
The weird thing is, I've seen like, perfect disconnects that were very clearly all at the same time, intended to ban both parties - but how is the other guy getting away with it? Is it just fellow hackers being dicks? Seems a lengthy process to reload every time for imaginary keks when you can't even see the person's reaction
>>30746033
>he's never played Sonic