>he actually thought the whole board would have been contained

>>30569969
when she tries to act tough, she looks very cute.

Honestly if they tried forcing Pokemon to only be on /vg/ not only would /v/ get spammed with Pokemon threads but the threads on /vg/ would die off very quickly, causing people to create multiple threads, causing all the other threads to die off. By killing this board it would plunge one into chaos that could rival the hay-day of mlp on /b/ and would probably end up killing another board. The only way /v/ and /vg/ wouldn't get completely slammed is if some of the thread spam was put on /co/ and /a/.

>>30570331
How would the threads die quickly? Maybe by reaching bump limit fast

To be fair, it probably could. The vast majority of threads on this board fall into one of the following categories:
- Threads that could easily belong on /e/, /h/, /c/, /trash/, etc.
- Duplicate threads about the same topic
- Simple questions that really don't deserve their own thread
- Threads where people just blog their opinion and think that other people give a shit

You could probably get rid of this board and everything would still be fine. The only issue is that 75% of this board is underage so they would just shit up /vg/ and the rest of the board would complain about us.
- Pointless meta-thread (such as this one)

>>30570611
Imagine having injection general and WiFi general squabbling with each other in the same thread, while somebody's asking what Pokemon you forget the most and there's a group shouting about the anime episode, 3 people are running Nuzlockes and it's Phox Phriday.

>>30570915
Also VGC players and Showdown players in one thread.

>>30570977
And the draw threads, give aways, waifu threads, and quests (which could easily be relocated but still)