>"It annoys me when people ask me to remove my watermark."

>>30360762
Commissions.

Many artists of ages pasts signed their work though; it's not a new practice. Plastering a watermark over the whole thing is stupid but the concept is fine.

>>30360897
I wonder what he can do If I just ignore 'em and use the art anyway.

>>30360969
He could send a C&D but since the characters aren't his intellectual property it wouldn't hold up in court.

Why would you want to though? Use something without a dA logo all over it. Pearl7's older stuff looks better than that anyway.

>>30360762
His art is simple enough that you could easily remove them using photoshop.

>>30360762
>profiting from existing IP that they have no permission to use

File: pokemon-vsoff.png (196KB, 997x724px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 997x724px

>>30361252
Working on a little project.

I'll keep the watermarks intact
It shouldn't really hurt the bigger picture.