Alright, listen here you fucks. Keep the following in mind before

>>30284410
But the real question: if you use 6IV Dittos, are the offspring legit?

>>30284441
Yes. Only autists would worry about that.

>>30284441
Was it made in game?

>>30284441
According to the official rules, Jo they are not.

But seeing as how nobody enforces this shit because nobody could be fucked to care, it doesn't really matter.

>>30284665
There's no way to enforce it because there's no way to know. It's a non-issue. No info is passed from the parent Ditto except the IVs.

>>30284665
How the hell are they going to know, though?

Never mind the fact that 6IV Dittos are easier to get than ever.

>>30284583
Since the odds of having a "legit" 6IV Ditto are incredibly small, the usual answer is no. Let us too go with no for the sake of argument.

>>30284730
They're not gonna know, it's just a technicality

>>30284846
So the same with """legal""" hacked in mons?

:^)

>>30284441
Yeah, the only time ""inheriting hacks"" is anything other than autistic dribble is when an illegal ball type is passed down like that one aegislash in a dream ball in vgc

>>30284904
why are you using distancing quotes, wtf? they ARE legal. that is the established term for them. whether or not you consider them fair has nothing to do with the naming terminology lmao

>>30285040
This.

If you're smart with your Pokemon, you should be allowed to compete. Hacked or not. The results are exactly the same.

>Hacking in a childrens game
>eSports
fucking pathetic desu