Objectively, what is the worst Pokemon type? Aesthetically

>>30252077
Rock

>>30252077
Depends on what a person thinks is bad aesthetically.

There are some types where the Pokemon HAS to have a particular feature in order for its type to be recognizable, and some people might find that bad aesthetically. But others might not.

>>30252077
>objectively
>aestheticly
Pick one

>>30252077
Competitively it's Rock, no doubt about it.

You can't really judge aesthetics objectively but anything based on a physical element is restricted by that element, at least if it's their primary type. A primary Fire type has to look like a Fire type, a primary Steel type has to look like a Steel type, etc.

Meanwhile something like a Psychic type or a Dark type can be a lot more varied because it isn't restricted by a rigid element that its design has to fit.

Normal, they're just my mom's pets.