>Battle Royal isn't last man standing Why would they

>>30099552
Because it would then otherwise completely outclass free-for-alls in double battles

They don't want the first loser to get bored.

File: fuck everything.gif (3MB, 267x199px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 267x199px

>>30099552
It isn't?

I thought it was to prevent ganging up on someone

>>30099552
Wait really? That's dumb as fuck. How is the winner determined, most damage done before it's over?

>>30099656
Most KOs, then most PKMN left, then most HP left

>>30099610
>>30099626
>>30099656
The winner is determined by how many KOs you get and how many Pokemon you've lost, and the battle ends when one player loses all their mons

>>30099672
Which IMO is pretty bs. Glass cannons and set up and suicide pokemon are worthless. I was looking forward to Pokemon multi battle politics. But nope. Firs t person dead and it ends. So might as well just rush down one person.

Its supposed to add an element of strategy. Say there's a dude on the field with 2 KOs, You with 1 KO, Other Dude with 1 KO, and Wimp-kun down to his last mon.

2 KOs guy is obviously targeting wimp-kun to clinch the game, you and other dude want to prevent that and keep wimp in the game so you can build more points and overtake his lead