The problem isn't Pokemon that are based on objects.
The problem is shitty designs.
>>29632882
>Anchor better than Vanilluxe
nah
>>29632882
>Muk better than Vanilluxe or based gears
What makes a Pokemon an "objectmon"? Because Aromatisse and Spritzee are based on Perfume bottles but they never make these lists.
All of the Pokémon you posted are good, especially Vanilluxe. I love all Pokémon. Yes, Gen 1 and 2 are generally better, but that doesn't mean that later Gens are bad.
>>29632882
Hey man, I like Garbodor
>Amonguss, Garbodor and Klefki are bad
No. Ugly =/= Bad
>>29632882
>Amoonguss
>shit
The only thing that's shit here is your taste
>>29632882
>amoonguss
>bad
>>29632882
Amoongus and booboo keys are great. Fuck you and your shit taste.
>>29632882
hey, I like Klefki :(
>>29632919
Swirling and Slurpuff are based on Desserts (Cotton Candy and Meruinge)
>>29632882
>voltrob good
>garbrodor bad
>Literally a ball
>Literally a pile of sludge
>Better than Booboo Keys, cool gears and ice cream
You're an idiot.
>>29632882
>based on an object
>not what makes the design shit
>>29632987
This.
Also
>Klinklang bad
>anchor good
Good to see that everyone in this thread except OP has good taste.
>>29632882
>tfw I actually like the pokemon based on inanimate objects
The ice cream cone was actually pretty useful
>>29632882
I fixed it
>>29632882
Swap Electrode and Klinklang and I agree.
>>29633075
Perfect
>>29632882
>electrode
>anchor
>good
>>29633075
/thread
>>29632930
Underrated post.
Op is right most of these are terrible
>>29632995
>>Literally a ball
You would literally mistake it as an item and get fucked when you find out it's an explosive mimic instead. The former one is a dum cartoon mushroom you can see from 50ft away that it isn't a pokeball.
Op is right most of these are terrible
>>29632908
>>29633040
>>29632951
>>29632971
>>29632995
>>29633110
WHY does everyone here hate based anchormon?
>>29633075
this
>>29633228
I don't anon. Actually it's one of my favourites this gen. Last gen I really struggled to even find mons that I liked, but I already have multiple teams planned for sun and moon.
>>29633191
Oh yes, I would literally mistake a ball that's just under 4 feet for a ball a few inches large.
>>29633228
I don't hate it, it's just that at least half of the """shit""" designs look better.
>>29633075
OP BTFO
>>29633075
You're the hero we needed
>Magneton
>good
Magneton is just a bunch of its preevos slapped onto it two more times. The only reason I ever caught one was because I wanted a Magnezone.
And don't even TRY to bait me with thinking Electrode has ever been good you delusional fuck.
>>29632919
Spritzee/Aromatisse are bird fairy monsters with a perfume bottle motif, not literal perfume bottles with eyes.
Magnemite is a ball with literal screws and magnets attached. Klingklang is made up of actual gears. Garbador is literally a garbage bag.
>>29632919
When they're basically THE inanimate object but with facial features slapped on them.
isn't Vanilluxe supposed to be an icicle? I could've sworn I read that in the Japanese games it's name and design was based off of an icicle, but it got mistranslated in English.
It's a small point but I think the design fits better if so
>>29632882
>Voltorb
>good
You invalidated your own argument, dumbass
>>29633678
It's an icicle covered in snow if I recall correctly
>>29633075
>>29633678
That seems unlikely seeing as it was designed by an English-speaker.
>>29632882
>Amoongus
>Shit
wrong.
Foongus is better tho.
>>29633682
>Voltorb.
You outplayed yourself there buddy.
>>29633753
Yeah, just read up on it. Apparently it's design ja based on both ice cream and icicles
>>29633075
Thank goodness someone here has common sense.
Their designs are mostly decent, people just objectively dislike how they look.
Compare most pokemon to "other" monster franchises and you quickly see the difference between good and bad design.
>>29634276
the main reason people dislike objectmons is because they can't imagine they being real
>>29634324
If it was a fleshlight mon they'd be down, I'm sure.
The only ones I don't care for are anchormon and gearmon
>>29634363
the porn would be through the roof
>>29634276
>objectively
>>29632882
>Gen 5 is shit
How to buttblast /vp/ 101
>>29634459
Well, /vp/ was made in 2010, maybe that's the reason?
Although /vp/ and /tr/ are two very different things.
>>29632882
>Aegislash
>good
>not a single bad one in shit
What make a Pokemon design objectively good in the first place?
>>29633075
>those pokemons
>good
>>29632882
>magneton
>literally 3 magnemites pinned together
>good design
>>29634766
>pokemons
opinion disregarded and thrown in the trash
>>29634837
>replying with memes
Your reply doesn't even counts. Try again.
>garbodor and vanilluxe in shit design
>all the hate towards OP's shit taste
I'm glad I'm not the only one who love their design and they were my bros
>>29632882
>comparing magneton to klinklang
Also the Klink line is way better than the Magnemite line, kys
>>29633228
Shitty taste, best pokemon this gen.
>>29632995
>literally a keychain
>literally an icecream cone
>literally gears
>better than a sludge monster or a explosive mimic
Lmao
>>29632882
I agree with all of these except I prefer Garbodor over Muk.
Kelfki's an great design, even if it's not appealing to everyone.
Otherwise, I agree with you.
>>29632882
>hating on Garbodor
>>29632882
Gears actually looks good. The rest I agree but you forgot to put sandcastle on shit.
>>29635114
if Voltorb is a mimic, what does it make Electrode?
An upside down mimic? Do you realize how stupid that is?
>>29633191
Random items probably don't actually look like giant Pokeballs in-universe.
>>29632882
My main problem:
>When Pokemon first started it was mostly based on fantasy RPG designs and other myths (Squirtle was a kappa, Voltorb was a mimic etc.)
>Ice cream
I'm all for making a product accessible to all, but why throw away your roots like that?
>>29636092
but they didn't? You're acting like they don't make Pokemon based on myths anymore.
>>29632882
>Muk
>good
>Electrode
>good
>Everything under shit
>shit
Is hating on Garbodor's design a meme? Is it because it is based on literal trash? It's easily one of the more creative designs, I love how Trubbish's bag bursts open from the bottom when it evolves, just like a real life overstuffed trashbag. I'm not trying to bait, I'm just curious about what elements of Garbodor's design are so offensive
>>29632882
Lmao you have bad taste
>>29633191
You do realize that Amoonguss is viewed from above by the player, right? That's why the mushroom cap is a pokeball.
>>29634376
>gearmon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism
Two of its gears have 38 and 49 teeth, hence why Klink evolves at levels 38 and 49.
>anchormonIt's a collection of things that fail in the Bermuda triangle (plane propeller, anchor, boat steering wheel, compass, etc.)
Not that it'll make you like them any more, but there you go.
>>29636138
Is that a boob window
Klefki is not bad, but I think is wasted potential.
>>29632882
All my favorite inanimate obejct Pokemon are on the left. There is nothing terribly wrong with the Amoonguss line, Klink line, Vanilluxe line and Trubbish line. While I also like the new anchor, the Magnemite line and Electrode, I don't see the greatness in the Honedge line. It's still pretty good though.
This is completely subjective and silly.
>>29632882
>calling Garbodor shitty
the only thing that's shitty is your taste, OP
>>29632930
I think the gen 1, 2 and 5 object mons are the only acceptable ones. Everything else should literally be retconned it's so bad.
>>29632882
>Amoongus
>Objectmon
what
>>29632882
God this shit gets old.
>>29632882
>The problem is shitty designs.
But there's no way to gauge it.
>>29633075
Bless you.
>>29633075
remove amoongus
>>29633639
I like Electrode more thanks to Generations
Electrode a cute
>>29637641
why
>>29637734
Because he's a good egg.
>>29637784
but he's a fungus
>>29637834
The he's a good fungus.
>>29633025
Fuck you, Anchor is god tierSo is Klinklang
>>29637899
but a fungus isn't an object
>>29638021
Technically none of them are, considering they're all alive.
>>29638050
well objectmons are just pokemon based on objects, all of them apply except amoongus
>>29638085
Fair enough.
>>29638405
You embarrass yourself.
>>29633075