So were berries introduced solely to eliminate the idea of pokemon eating other pokemon?
>>29566076
no, they were implemented to cure status effects.
>>29566083
/thread.
>>29566076
No. Pokedex still say stuff about Pokemon eating Pokemon (Taillow > Wurmple. Heatmore > Durant).
>>29566076
no.
glalie is scary as fug
Berries were introduced in Gen II to provide an in-battle use for Pokemons' newfound ability to carry items. Other items were created to boost damage or other things in battle, either generally (Charcoal) or for a specific Pokemon (Thick Club, Lucky Punch)
They also found a way to expand the Pokedex using items (Metal Coat, King's Rock)
Gen III expanded upon the berry premise to make a wider variety of berries with both general and niche use.
On the topic of Pokemon diet, all Pokemon can consume and digest berries, milk, carbonated beverages, and some herbal supplements. While plenty of Pokemon do eat meat, there is no evidence of them being true carnivores. While herbivores may exist, many Pokemon are omnivorous and likely sustain themselves on mixed diets.
>>29566139
>controls ice
>it can instantly freeze its foe solid
>It's still a complete shitmon
Why?
>>29566415
Because
Pokédex =/= Viability
>>29566076
Yeah, the same reason trees started having fruits, they wanted to stop animals eating each other.
>>29566076
in gen 1 everything was fine
since gen 2 they claim that they only eat berries
and since 2 gens they became neutral
and currently they even push that pokemon eat each other. just read the pokedex entry of this mon. (picture related)
>>29566139
Froslass freezes Pokemon and keeps their frozen corpses around as decorations.
>>29567134
sexy
>>29566076
Read the Pokedex.