>SM has done away with metas.
>tfw your favorite starter never got a mega.
It's not fair. Why did they only choose gems 1 and 3?
>>29411659
>Why did they only choose gems 1 and 3?
Nigga what? Audino and Lopunny got Megas and they're from Gens 4 and 5.
Also, Serperior doesn't necessarily NEED a Mega as it has the Leaf Storm/Contrary combo. What it does need is a better movepool though.
>>29412393
I meant for starters only my man.
>>29411659
It got contrary. get over it. Emboar got a cool ability too. Samurott got fucking BTFO
>>29412393
Gen 5 as a whole needs a better movepools. What the fuck were they thinking?
They just need to grit their teeth and start introducing significant stat and movepool changes each gen. Start fixing some of shitmons, and otherwise good Pokemon with NO MOVES.
>>29412707
they're too busy fucking your mom
>>29412707
Stat changes between gens tend to be very minor, mostly adding ten to a weak base stat. Alaoan forms seem to be the closest well get to an actual rework of old mons in terms of stats. I also don't see gamefreak expanding movepools until new types are introduced.
>>29412707
Flareon is older than a decent number of users here probably and still has no moves
>>29411659
>Why did they only choose gems 1 and 3?
Because Ruby and Sapphire got a remake while Mega Evo was a thing. If Gold and Silver got a remake when Mega Evo was thing, then those starters would get the Mega Evo
>>29414421
>Ruby and Sapphire got a remake while Mega Evo was a thing
It hurts
>>29411659
because we don't need a mega for vorefags.