Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 1473290836153.jpg (44KB, 480x293px) Image search:
[Google]
44KB, 480x293px
>literally a (object)
>literally a (animal)
>literally a (person)
>literally a generic (____-type)
>literally doesn't even look like a (____-type) wtf
>literally (animal) + (animal) + (object)
>literally rip-off (gen 1-3 pokemon)
>too goofy
>over designed
>under designed
After seeing so many of these popular complaints, I'm curious as to what you look for in a pokemon. What is your idea of a perfect pokemon design? I get /vp/ isn't one person, I just rarely see good-design Circle-Jerks
>>
Pokemon is bad
>>
>>29282643
Wew, did you get lost on your way to /v/?
>>
>>29282558
Not Shuckle. It is based on something too small to see normally.
>>
File: 1476135794724.jpg (27KB, 800x600px) Image search:
[Google]
27KB, 800x600px
>>29282643
>>
>>29282558
Good Pokemon design?
>has a great concept
>fits into the role of evolution perfectly
>great design(adding some random marks that don't make any fuckin sense isn't good design, it just over complicates the thing)
>stays bipedal or quadruple, make up your fucking mind
>not humanoid or human-like unless it's concept is supposed to represent human like qualities
>not furbait
>not waifubait but you fuckers will dick anything and meme around it
>literal equivalent of another thing but poorly designed
>copy and paste with minor details FUCK GENIES
Knowing /vp/, they'll bootlick and worship shit, see: shitposting about HM removal
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2