Reminder that Sinnoh only had 63 new Pokémon that weren't cross-gen evos or legendaries.
Yes, we're aware that Gen 4 is shit.
Thank you for reminding us.
>sinnoh had almost as many pokemon as kalos excluding all the good ones
Gen 4 truly was a gem when it came to its Pokemon.
>>29170002
Hoenn fags stand out more than anyone
Why does everyone in this board have such a hateboner for cross evos jesus fuck
Reminder that Unima has more pokémon than Kanto and almost all /vp/ hate that gen.
Why?
>>29170096
What gen V was bomb
>>29170041
Too many had annoying evolution methods that made them inaccessible to a lot of players. I'm glad they've cut back.
>>29169989
Why wouldn't you count legendaries?
>>29170096
Gen 5 was the best faggot
>>29170041
There is nothing wrong with the concept of cross gen evos, see gentoo. The problem is when they are done poorly, see genfor.
i liked gen 4 but do not feel the urge to make a thread about it. people who dislike gen 4 for convoluted reason x do.
this says something
>>29170186
Hoenbabies constantly shit on Gen 4 to make their shit games and even worse remakes look better by comparison
>>29170041
I'd prefer that they'd spend their time making all new Pokemon lines instead
Especially since they're often uglier than the Pokemon they came from and have annoying evolution methods
and yet it was the peak of Pokemon games
it really makes you think
>>29169989
No one forgot. I hope some non-native mons (Zubat, Geodude, Psyduck, Machop, Tentacool, Wingull, Wooper just off the top of my head) get Sinnoan forms in the hypothetical remake. And more Sinnohmons get a west/east alternative style like Shellos, even if it's just the aquatic and amphibious ones like Finneon, Buizel and Croagunk.