Assuming that the current total of new Pokemon, other than the

File: 1376860159312.jpg (13KB, 167x139px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 167x139px

I would be ok with ~80 Pokemon if they only revealed about 30 or so. But instead, just like XY, they've revealed almost all of them.

I get that they want to generate hype while also avoiding 1000+ Pokemon for as long as possible, but there's gotta be a better way than spoiling almost all of the new Pokemon in the game. It doesn't help that the starter evos were leaked so early, either.

>>29164518
I love most of the designs and am struggling to try and narrow down my team of six.

However, I want around 100 mons. The number of mons in Gen 6 was unacceptably low. 100 isn't too little, but it also isn't too many. It seems reasonable.

>>29164849
You basically said everything that's in my head.

>>29164780

Where are people getting this 'avoiding 1000 Pokemon' idea from? It's never said anywhere that they can't get to 1000, they can and there's no reason why they can't.

>>29164518
I wouldn't be mad, I have enough for two teams, but I want 100+

>>29167418
I hate people that say that too. Unova added 156, more than Kanto or any other gen. I really want a bunch of Pokemon, even if most of them are forgettable, just to make these people shut up