So who is the most reliable leaker at this stage? Guzma leaker,

Chinese leaker.

>>28684960
>Guzma leaker,
Lol

Definitely not the Guzma leaker

>>28684960
Riddler and Chinese.
Who the hell is the Guzma leaker?

>Guzma leaker

Literally who?

>>28684960
Riddler, then Chinese. Guzma (the leaker) was barely brought up I kinda forgot about him.

I trust Guzma because he said UBs are pokemon which means they're catchable and I REALLY want that to be true

>>28685089
I don't think I ever said that.

Literally none of the leaks have been right so far. Are you an retart op?

>>28685121
What did you say then
Whats the leak, Guzman?

>In b4 people actually reply to a tripfag named "Anything4(You)s".

>>28685149
>chinese leak
>wrong
Pick one

File: Huh.jpg (36KB, 403x297px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 403x297px

>>28684960
>Guzma Leaker
Wait, wut?

>>28684960
Chinese leak is confirmed but only has the bit of info posted.

Riddler is legit but speaks in riddles so it only makes sense in hindsight.

Guzma is probably just fucking with us

Riddler and Chinese leaker.

>>28685149
I admire your work, keep it up

>all these idiots implying that the real leaks leak isn't the most reliable of them all

>>28685149
>none of the leaks have been right so far
Be truthful anon, are you new here?
Or are you just baiting?

>mfw a leakfag too BTFO to reply to me
>>28685208
>chinese leak
>right
Pick one, which btw are still wrong lol xD
>>28685316
Thanks bb I don't really try but I will 4 (You) now.
>>28685424
I've been here since leakfags got destroyed yesterday, and back in August.

>>28685471
what are you even talking about? did you have a stroke while typing out this bait?

>>28685471
>leakfags got destroyed
Ah, so you're baiting then. Might need to make it more subtle.

>>28684960
>So who is the most reliable leaker at this stage?
Gee, I dunno. It's impossible to figure out

http://forums.bulbagarden.net/index.php?threads/rumours-fakes-leaks-discussion-thread.214874/