>They're called Pokemon Battles
>Ultra Beasts aren't Pokemon
>Therefore, you can't battle them and they're just NPCs.
Prove me wrong.
>>28543724
>They're just battles
>Your Pokemon die if the UBs KO them.
>>28543724
Then why Tapu Koko is charging towards UB02 in the trailer?
You're telling me that's not allowed and/or illegal? :)
Your chain of thought doesn't consider the possiblity of non-Pokémon Battles
>>28543754
>nuzlocke is now canon
>>28543754
>just battles
Official site calls them specifically Pokemon Battles.
http://www.pokemon-sunmoon.com/en-us/battle-royal/
>>28543754
>we nuzlocke now
>>28543724
What about the PokéStudios opponents, then? Were those Pokémon too? You could battle them, after all.
>>28543827
>You could "battle" a green screen
>>28543850
Still a battle
>>28543827
You battled an idea
>>28543772
They specifically call them Pokemon battles, though and UBs are specifically not called Pokemon. We don't even see them in actual battle with Tapu Koko - evidence that it's just a cutscene.
>>28543724
You haven't played the game and there's absolutely no official confirmation.
Therefore you're just an ignoramus.
>>28543890
Are ideas Pokémon?
>>28543724
It's still a pokemon battle if one of the participants is a pokemon
>>28543899
Human Black Belts can have a Karate Battle.
>>28543899
They say Pokémon Battles, but they don't say that's the only kind of battle that exists
>>28543928
>In the past, Pokémon battles have generally been battles of one Trainer against another.
>They also allow players a new way to enjoy Pokémon battles
UBs are separated from Pokemon on the official site. Therefore, it's obvious with logic that you can't battle them.
>>28543966
Nice head canon.
>>28543950
[citation required]
>>28543983
You site that Pokémon battles are the only from of battles that exist. The existance of the prefix Pokémon suggests that other forms of battle exist.
>>28544017
Pokemon battles are the only type of real battles.
>>28543724
I love this low level shitposting. Reminds me of the "1 tiny island" shitposting from a few months back. Gud times
>>28544102
>No counter point so I'll just call it shit posting meme
Thanks, Pokejungle.
>>28543724
guaranteed replies
Love that no one has a counter point other than
>Maybe they'll make up a new type of battle head canon
OR
>Is this bait!?!1!?
This is the stupidest thing I've ever heard and I can't believe how many people seem to have this same thinking. Just because something is not a pokemon doesn't mean a pokemon can't fucking fight it.
>>28544382
But they're called Pokemon Battles, you can't have a Pokemon Battle with non-Pokemon, unless you think the official site is lying to us?
>>28544549
Yeah you can. If you punch a Charizard in the face and it proceeds to bite your arm off, that's called "battling a Pokemon."
>>28544630
But it's not a Pokemon battle, that's not the same thing.
I'm sure UB-02 will 'fight' Tapu Koko, but it won't be a 'battle', it'll just be a cut scene and they'll just be NPCs.
>Encounter Ultra Beasts during the story
>Something happens that causes them to be regular Pokemon that you can capture
>Need a held item to turn them back into Ultra Beasts
That's what I think will happen, but it's still up in the air at this point.
>>28543724
>They're called Ultra Beasts
>this means they can't be caught with Pokeball
>however this does NOT mean that they can't be caught some other way
You got proven wrong.
>>28544880
That is not my point at all. I am saying they can't be battled. Did you read the OP or just start mashing the keyboard?
>>28543724
>it isn't literal so it's wrong
This is autism.
>>28545229
Is it any worse than the "they aren't Pokemon so you can't catch them" arguments?
>>28543724
wtf is that shit?
>power ranger villain No. Mosquito
>anorexic goddess roach
wtf is this gen? fuckin new game...