Why is modern Pokemon art so horribly inferior to the classic

>>28313322
take off your nostalgia glasses and realize those look mediocre at best

File: HNI_0061.jpg (24KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x270px

>>28313322
Art styles don't exist.

>water down and over polish

What?

go back to /v/ with your horrible opinions

>>28313322
When they grew as a corporation, franchise and market value.
It was too much merchandising for just one people to take care of, so they had to standarize their designs and style for all north korean outsourced workers to produce.

>>28313322
>being this genwunner
gtfo

File: 1446123036707.jpg (45KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1000x1000px

>>28313322

File: please leave.png (75KB, 464x479px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 464x479px

>>28313322

>genwunner post
>2016

>>28313322
It looks like shit anon

The purpose of official character art is to showcase what the thing looks like as clearly and neatly as possible.
Watercolor looks great, but it doesn't do well to convey coloration with 100% accuracy.

> At what point did they decide to water down

Old artwork literally done in water colours

>>28313421
look at charizard in the anime back in the day and then now and say that to my face

File: 250px-Type_Null.png (49KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 250x250px

>>28313322
D E V I A N T A R T

Why are you asking us?

>>28313322

Modern with fresh vibrant colours and cute moe faces is way better than the washed-out style with the ugly angular Dragon Ball faces.