It's a "slap a face on an inanimate object" Pokemon

>>28251194
>Gen 2
>no object mons

No wonder why Gen 2 was so shit

File: 250px-192Sunflora.png (50KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 250x250px

>>28251194
Literally just a sunflower with a smiley face on it.

Banette and all other ghost types should be in that list if you're using shuppet logic

>>28251194
>>28251251
Corsola & Unown could be considered ones too.

>>28251251
>sunflower
>inanimate

Literally kys

>>28251194
>Exeggcute
You might as well include every single plant-based Pokemon then, since you're including a bunch of seeds that are designed to look like eggs.

>>28251225
The unown are pretty much letters with eyes.

>>28251194
Seedot is a literal acorn with feet

>>28251251
>>28251270
No, Sunflora and Corsola are based off of actual living species. Sunflowers and coral are alive.

>>28251270
>>28251251
I think Unown counts but sunflowers and coral are alive.
Eggs are idk, inbetween? So I guess Exeggcute can be on there?

>>28251284
Letters are not tangible objects anon

I don't think it's fair to lost Shuppet as an object mon.

As far as these go, the only ones I dislike are the Vanilluxe line and Palossand. I fucking love Garbodor, Chandelure, Drifblim, and Bronzong. The rest are good.

>>28251194
>No Baltoy and Claydol

>>28251225
He forgot Pineco and Forretress though.

File: Saz-Chapman-3.jpg (446KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 800x533px

>>28251313

>>28251334
>Pineco and Forretress though
>Bagworms

>>28251194
Gen 1: Ditto?
Gen 2: Unown, Sudowoodo?
Gen 3: Nosepass, Baltoy, Claydol, Banette, Solrock, Lunatone, Castform
Gen 4: Rotom(s)?
Gen 5:
Gen 6: Swirlix, Avalugg, Diancie
Gen 7: Minior

File: tumblr_mtztrdSf6c1qet5hfo1_500.png (402KB, 500x687px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 500x687px

Fuck you, a lot of these are my favorites

How could you literally forget Golem?

>>28251371
Pineco is a literal pinecone

File: 1458351288213.png (81KB, 1006x930px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1006x930px

>>28251194
Why the shit do you have Combee on here? It's a damn bee that has the shape of a honeycomb. You may as well include Onix on the list since it's a bunch of rocks that are simply in the shape of a snake.

And why isn't Golem included here? It's a bunch of rocks as well.

File: 1458155835455.jpg (16KB, 297x207px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 297x207px

>>28251414
It's a bagworm in the shape of a pinecone. This should be common knowledge by now

>>28251449

I assume because Golem has a head slapped on and not a face.

>>28251284
This is the same shitty defense used for other pokemon like Vanillite. Just stop, they were designed to look like eggs, and their name suggests the same

>>28251475
And the Vanillite line is based off icicles. What's your point?

this is really inconsistent. Why do Geodude and Graveler count but Roggenrola's line doesn't? Why do Grimer and Muk count but not Gulpin and Swalot?

>>28251194
Where is Gastly, Dogars, Weezing, Unown, Glalie, Banette, Nosepass, Probopass, Magnezone, Rotom, Beldum? They're all based on inanimate objects. Some are worse than another. I'm feeling a huge bias here against a certain generation.

>>28251568
Because OP is a fag. I'll make a better chart tomorrow

>>28251540
Icicles are inanimate objects. Pineco is a bagworm hiding in a pinecone. Retard.

>>28251625
Also possibly Golett, Golurk, Roggenrola, Boldore, Gigalith, Gulpin, Swalot, Corsola, Minior, Lunatone and Solrock. All mainly based on inanimate objects.

>>28251194
My bros are Magneton and Chandelure.

Only one of these I truly hate is Combee.

File: 1468681004914.png (514KB, 850x450px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 850x450px

>>28251540
>what's your point?
Icicles = inanimate objects
bagworm = living creature that covers itself in stuff
If you can't see my point here, then forget it.

>>28251517
>it's a shitty defense to actually be knowledgeable and know what a Pokemon is instead of being a complete ignoramus who only looks at the surface and takes in partial information
Whatever you say, chief.

>>28251568
Ignorance and the inability to actually use a little something called the human brain, Anon. It's an issue of incompetence and half-assery

>>28251650
If Combee is included because it's design is from honeycombs even though it's a bee, then Pineco must be included too because it's DESIGN is from pinecones.

>>28251194
If you're including Geodude, why are you not including every other Rock Pokemon?

>>28251251
>Plants are inanimate objects

>>28251194
Some of them are well done, like voltorb, driftbloon, cofragious, Chandelure and Aegislash

Others are trash like Exeggcutor, Vanilluxe and Pallosand

>>28251568
>>28251625
There would be way too many if the criteria were just "inanimate objects". That would pretty much automatically include all rock-types, the Porygon line, Magearna, Golurk line, etc, which aren't really in the same category as Palossand or Vanilluxe. I built the list for mons that are literally just their real-world objects with a face.

>>28251568
I forgot Roggenrola. What inanimate object is the Gulpin line based on?

There are no bad looking object-mons.

>>28251194
>Leaving out Metapod, Kakuna, Exeggutor, Koffing, Weezing, and Mr. Mime
It looks like OP is a fucking genwunner.

>>28251855
Unown, Rotom Forms, Lunatone, Solrock still qualify don't they? Just alphabets/signs, appliances, sun and moon shaped rocks with faces/eyes. And I'm sure Combee isn't just honeycomb with faces. It has wings, antennae, and abdomen. Same for Garbodor. It actually has arms and legs, and bunny-ear like structure.

>>28251194
You forgot jigglypuff the balloon pokemon

File: vanilla_with_2_big_black_dicks.jpg (14KB, 159x240px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 159x240px

>>28251194
Fix your Vanilluxe reference, boyo.

File: Honedge.png (239KB, 500x509px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 500x509px

>>28251194
>What do you think of object-mons in general?
They vary from being really lame to really good. All in all, though, I feel like people are way too harsh on the ones that aren't from Gen 7.
>Hoping for more in gen VII
Considering how shitty the ones we've seen so far are, I hope not.
>Which ones are your favorites?
The Honedge line are my favorite pokemon over all. I'm not sure what it is exactly, I just think they look nice, especially Aegislash. I also really love Cofagrigus, Chandelure, and Garbodor.
>Which are your least favorites?
The ones from Gen 7. They're just fucking awful.
>Uhh, a lei, because there are leis in Hawaii.
>Uhh, a sandcastle, because there are sandcastles in hawaii.
It's like if they made a beret pokemon, or an Eiffel Tower pokemon.
>B-But they're not as bad as the other ones!
They're literally the most unoriginal object-mons besides MAYBE Litwick, but even then, Litwick actually evolves into something interesting.On the other hand, the Lei one is just a Lei with a vague leafy orb on it, and the sandcastle is just a sandcastle with two tiny tiny dots in it. If you erased the eyes, there'd be literally no difference between it and a regular sandcastle.
>Do you use any on your main team?
Aegislash all day, man.

Also, shouldn't Gavalugg be on there too? If its prevo counts as an object because it's based on icicles, it should count as an object because it's based on an iceberg. Also, I don't know if Carbink/Geodude/Muk should be on there; natural elements that are alive are very different from man-made objects that are alive.

>>28251194
>>What do you think about object pokemon in general?
>>Hoping for more in Gen VII or not?
>>Which ones are your favorites?
>>Which are your least favorites?
>>Do you use any on your main team?

1. I'm fine if the design's actually interesting and neat. Like Driflblim, Chandelure, Aegislash is nice to me.
2. Yes if it's good.
3. Favourites: Magnemite and Chandelure family
4. Voltorb, Klink, klefki and Carbink families.
5. I used Drifblim, Magnemite, Klink and Chandelure family in my main teams.

What about Teddiursa and Stufful? I know they're technically just bears (or a red panda for the latter?), but don't they specifically represent a -teddy- bear and -stuffed- animal (butt tag and all) respectively?
Whereas Pancham and Cubchoo are straight up bears, for example.

File: 7112430-icicle-hd-wallpapers.jpg (34KB, 472x400px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 472x400px

>>28252117
The real fix

>>28251194
...so...who cares and why?

File: Carbink.jpg (196KB, 561x600px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 561x600px

>>28252134
Why do you dislike Carbink, anon? Not trying to bash on you, but it's one of my favorites and I see that quite a number of people dislike it. I just want to know the rationale.

File: FreezieWiiU.png (205KB, 401x431px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 401x431px

>>28252173
It can be both.

Biologically it is living ice.

>>28252229
I like him.

>>28252210
>who
autists
>why
autism

>>28251726
Combee shouldn't be included since it's literally three bees stuck together. Same with Pineco, its just a bagworm that mimics a pinecone. Non are inanimate objects.

>>28251284
>since you're including a bunch of seeds that are designed to look like eggs.

Well then none of them should be on the list. Everything here is based off of an inanimate object, but IS animate as a pokemon.

Same thing with exeggcute. It's actually a bunch of sentient seeds, but it's visually designed after eggs.

>>28251517
It's actually not the same at all.

>Exeggcute
>seeds (living things) that are meant to resemble eggs (contain embryos)

>Vanillite
>a combination of an icicle/snowball/ice cream, all three of which are not living things

But by all means, continue making yourself look like a complete retard.

>>28252210
>>28253874
>any pokemon discussion on a pokemon board
w-who cares? amirite?

What do people gain from this? Looking special?

>>28251377
>Ditto
If it's based on anything, it'd probably be an amoeba.

>Sudowoodo
Bonsai tree/fossilized wood.

>>28251194
>gen 2 has no inanimates

BTFO gen 2 best gen forever

>>28251377
>nosepass

idc either way if this is animate, its a shitmon and needs to die.

>>28251194
Objectmons are fine, honestly, but some get a little too literal.

It wouldn't hurt to make more animal/object hybrids or something, for example a mop-dog with broken handle for a tail.

>>28254069
Best gen with over 50% of the dex unusable ? Yeah, best gen ever.

>>28254087
>can clear the game with any 'ol shitmon
>unusable
Not everyone plays on SMOGON, Anon.

>>28254115
Yeah, cause Dunsparce, Unown, Sunflora and most Gen 2 mons that got an evolution in Gen 4 totally, but without it aren't shit on regular Wi-Fi. And Eviolite is not an option.

File: 1472634778335.jpg (75KB, 440x660px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 440x660px

Personally, I prefer this kind of Pokémon. Weird Pokémon have unusual animations and are funniest.

If I wanted to play with animals I'd play with my dog.

>>28254148
Eviolite isnt an option because it's not available in earlier gens

where the power creep is smaller and they are still usable in main game?

What's your point?

If Sunkern doesn't count, neither should Exeggcute. It's a bunch of seeds, not eggs.

>>28251816
Palosand is my bro. Leave him out of this.

>>28251194
You forgot Koffing for gen 1 and Wobbuffet for gen 2.

>>28254221
Current times.

Pretty sure castform is supposed to be one of the little dolls you put for shuppet. Shuppet is just a sheet with a ghost under it. Why isn't banette there either? Isn't it just a possessed teddy? I guess those already have faces though.

>>28251194
Remove Exeggcute. It's a group of seeds designed to resemble eggs, not eggs come to life.

Remove Combee. It's a group of bees designed to resemble bees in a hive, not a honeycomb come to life.

Retard.

File: 1471286806843.png (66KB, 159x276px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 159x276px

>>28252131
>I just think they look nice, especially Aegislash
>especially Aegislash

>>28251194
Make a decent chart if you want to stir up discussion.faggot.

>>28251194
Ghosts haunt things, of course they're going to be inanimate objects. And following this logic, shouldn't pretty much every rock type be an "inanimate object"?

>>28254836
Yeah, I don't think ghost Pokemon should count at all, unless there's an extremely egregious example. Ghost probably has the most design freedom of all types since possessed animals and haunted objects are extremely popular and widespread tropes; not to mention possession is probably one of very few ways to create ghost Pokemon without running out of ideas.

>>28251291
In japan they believe all inanimate objects have souls

>>28251194
Out of those, Klefki is the most retarded looking one. Probably the worst designed Pokemon in years.

>>28251855
So just include them autist

Gen 7;
There will be a pokemon based on a Gameboy with pokemon game inside

pokeception

>>28251194
I'd add Baltoy and Claydol to the list.
>What do you think about object pokemon in general?
I'm fine with what I like but most of those designs are just 'okay'.
>Hoping for more in Gen VII or not?
Not really although Comfey is nice.
>Which ones are your favorites?
Chandelure, Aegislash, Carbink, Comfey.
Bronzong and Drifblim are cool too.
>Which are your least favorites?
Definitely Klefki and Pallosand. I'm not fond of Exeggcute, Claydol line and Vanniliux line as well
>Do you use any on your main team?
Nope.

Also, kek at gen VI having the biggest percentage with only 6 Pokemon.

>>28255116
Go home weeb.

>>28251194
>Counts Garbodor as inanimate while its based on living trash heaps
>Not counting Fruit Pokemon

File: 1438108695310.jpg (522KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1920x1080px

>>28255126
>>28251816
>shitting on pokemon designs
A reminder to get a load of this and be grateful for what you have

>>28251194
I dont see how Carbink and Bergnite are object pokemon

>>28251997
>Metapod
>Kakuna
>inanimate objects
kek

>>28254045
I'm just trying to figure out why people care about this.

>>28251194
I've always hated objectmons (part of the reason why gen 2 is my favorite). But for some reason, starting from gen 6 I've liked their designs.
I also like bronzor/bronzong for some reason too.

>>28255437
Why would you say you don't care for them?

File: uranium_pokedex.png (316KB, 1424x904px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1424x904px

>>28255366
> Still posting Yo-kai watch monsters
> Not posting Fakemon Pokédex with these Pokemon with no origin, uncreative and randomly created

>>28251997
>metapod and kakuna
based on the cocoon forms of a butterfly and a bee, i.e. things that are alive
>exeggutor
based on a palm tree, trees were organic lifeforms when I last checked
>mr. mime
<implying that mimes are inanimate objects

>>28251194
>vanillite line = ice cream
This again.

File: Yokai.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

We should be gratefull for past six generations not being Yokai.

>>28255763
If there was a hamburger Pokemon I would be so fucking triggered

>>28255366
>tfw I like most of them

It's a different game with a different aesthetic anon. They're Yokai, which traditionally can just be inanimate objects with eyes/limbs/whatever.

>>28251194
I can get Geodude, afterall born after something natural.
But electrode and magnamite are fucking unbearable, worse that trumbish.

Also, Cofagringus and shuppet had dead people inside it for a danm long time, so is not "too unnatural".

>>28251194
I asked my gf which line (gen) had the most interesting, non-bland, concepts and execution.

>She picked Gen VI
>Sorta proud

>>28255795
Like the fucking Sandcastle in gen7?

>>28251414
i don't think pinecones count as an object for the purposes of this thread anyway, because then you have to count seedot and any other pokemon based on a nut or seed

>>28251650
So that means mons like Honedge and Sandygast ate disqualified too, since they're not actually objects, but ghosts possessing those objects, right? Retard.

>>28255832
I'd be ashamed in her desu

>>28254209
yes pls

I think this kind of examination loses a lot of value when "inanimate objects" includes objects that occur in nature. Rock is a type, so it stands to reason that rock-type Pokemon are going to be made of rocks. Geodude and Graveller are just boulders with limbs, but Carbink is clearly more designed as a creature. Bergmite is themed after icebergs or whatever, but by looking at it you can tell it's a creature that just has an ice shell over the top of it, look at its legs. Nuts and seeds also shouldn't count, and Combee is bees, even though the design is themed after honeycombs.

Contrary to what I said about Bergmite, even though Vanillite is technically just a living icicle with snow on it, no part of that is alive and it's supposed to look like vanilla ice cream, so I'd say it counts.

>>28255846
Several ghost pokemon are bizarre, gross, or just straight up possessing objects. How strange it is that ghost-type pokemon made by a Japanese company would have some design overlap with Yokai, which are Japanese spirit-themed in their entirety? Dumbass.

You can't slap a face on a sarcophagus because it already has a face on it, retard.

>>28251855
So, what are those things sprouting from Geodude and Graveler, are they also faces?

Nob.

>>28255499
Even those are better then the Yokai.

>>28255499
>a literal Titanic fakemon

TOP KEK.

File: Untitled.png (2MB, 1362x1490px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1362x1490px

>>28255763
>>28255846
>STILL shitting on pokemon designs
Fine. Get a bigger load of it

>>What do you think about object pokemon in general?
I think most of them look good and don't deserve the hate they get. Chandelure is probably my favorite mon

>>Hoping for more in Gen VII or not?
I am hoping for more pokémon in general for Gen VII. I know they haven't revealed it all already but I hope we pass 100+

>>Which ones are your favorites?
Chandelure,Cofagrigus,Aegislash and Carbink

>>Which are your least favorites?
Garbodor and Klingklang

>>Do you use any on your main team?
I used Chandelure on White,Cofagrigus on White 2 and I used Aegislash on X. Don't plan on using comfey or Palossand on Sun/Moon

>>28255126
I don't understand the hate for Klefki and I don't think I ever will. It's a way better and more clever design than something like fucking Geodude or Voltorb.

>>28255435
Same reason people care about anything else in this series.

>>28251816
>well done
>like voltorb
i can't tel if you're serious or just trolling

>>28255463
I don't understand. I never said that.

>>28251194
I wouldn't include Exeggcute because it's based on a Yokai just as much as it's just a couple eggs, the Yokai that Exeggutor is based on has eggs that fall off when they laugh too much, which is what Exeggcute is based on.

Also, Shuppet isn't the pokemon that's based on the Teru Teru Bozu, Castform is.

And if you're going to include Bergmite you might as well include Avalugg.

>>28255308
>Go home weeb
I doubt anon ever leaves his home, actually

>>28255366
>>28255763
Is that Egoraptor as a panda? Neat.

File: 1456449983137.jpg (6KB, 142x141px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 142x141px

>>28251194
>Favorites
>Bronzong
>Chandelure line
>Cofagrigus

>Least Favorite
>Chimecho
>Duoblade

>Most Hated
>Garbador line
>Ice Cream line
>Gear line
>Muk line
>Pokeball line

>Least Hated
>Drifblim line
>Aegislash
>Shuppet line

I'm indifferent about everything else.

>>28251309
exeggcute are seeds dipshit

>>28256456
I mean, why do you hate objectmon in general?

>What do you think about object pokemon in general?
All pokemon have to be based on a real animal or I get horribly triggered.
>Hoping for more in Gen VII or not?
I want more silly foodmons. Maybe a pancake mon?
>Which ones are your favorites?
Honedge, Vanillite, Drifblim, Chimecho
>Which are your least favorites?
Exeggcute, it's actually just eggs with pointy ices and mouths drawn on, with no clever visual design elements.
>Do you use any on your main team?
Geodude, Magnemite, Bronzor, Drifloon, Vanillite, Litwick, and Honedge have all been on my main team during my first playthrough of a main series game.

>>28251194
I wouldn't mind Pile of sand, if he just looked like a better sandcastle.

>>28251414
Pinecones are alive retard

>>28259318
Oh. Well to be honest I have to correct myself: I can't say that's entirely true. It's just that I've always found most of them repulsive, mostly in gen 1 when I was young. Gen 2 was good because it didn't have any and I loved it for it. Gen 3 had few and they were tolerable, like Nosepass and Chimecho. Gen 4 had some but I didn't like most of them. Gen 5 had a lot of them and I disliked most of them. Turn gen 6 and for some reason I liked them all. So I guess what I really don't like is the idea behind some of these designs, and not really objectmons in general.

>>28259332
>I want more silly foodmons.
I have that. Food isn't a monster. It's so stupid.

>>28251225
>No wonder why Gen 2 was perfect

ftfy

>>28259491
>icicle that looks like ice cream
>becomes the origin of ice cream cones in Unova
I like that, it's clever and the visual design isn't bad.
I wouldn't mind a ghost/fairy that looks like food as long as it looks good.

>>28259491
>I have that
I meant I hate that.

>>28259613
If it looked just a tiny bit more like an icicle, and didn't have the waffle texture, I would like it more. This way it's just a lazy design, even if the backstory they came up with it is decent.
I can't say I would like the idea of a foodmon, but I wouldn't mind the idea of something like a chef's whisk being possessed.

>>28259491
>Cherrim
>Bounsweet
>Exeggcute
>Slurpuff

Just because it's based on food doesn't mean it literally is food, either;
>Tropius
>Miltank

>>28259748
Meant Cherubi, but oh well.

>>28255778
What about a cow based pokemon with a name referencing beef patties and a buns?

>>28259748
At least Cherubi and Bournsweet (and Tropius, and Exeggutor, and Miltank, etc) exist normally in the wild and aren't manmade. I hate it when they go full on manmade and have zero explanation for it.
Swirlix and Slurpuff are okay because they're meant to just be a representation of sweetness, hence Fairy type. Also they kinda look like animals too, instead of just being full on food copypastas.

>>28259697
The waffle texture looks elongated and matches the ice crystals elsewhere on its body though. I have more of a problem with Vanillish and Vanilluxe looking so similar.

>>28259804
>a cow pokemon that sort of looks like a burger with buns on its sides.
I'd put it on my team.

>>28254024

>Seeds are not living things. Students may not classify seeds as living things because they are not actively displaying characteristics of living things. Seeds are living things! Seeds contain an embryo that is capable of germinating to produce a new plant.

Dumb Genwunner poster.

>>28251194
I love inanimate object Pokemon quite a bit. Electrode, Vanilluxe, Klefki, Doublade, and Comfey are my current favs.

File: 1434031548318.png (109KB, 358x358px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 358x358px

Leave my nigga Litwick and evos out of this

Shit's fucking cool, alright?

>>28259929
It might match the ice crystals but it's a bit too obvious of a reference. I wouldn't have minded a more "random" and natural look just by not having the crystals being perfectly symmetric in its body. Also I hate multiple head mons, except Alolan Exeggutor which makes me laugh.