>any pokemon with semblance of strength or masculinity is

File: 1472333830989.jpg (150KB, 758x1000px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 758x1000px

>>28111514
Problem?

grow a pair ya big baby, just ignore it and enjoy the mon

It doesn't just happen for Pokemon. This reminds me, I saw this Lucky Charms commercial, and they seem to have adapted to the "Adventure Time" style, with long noodle arms and legs for the lepercaun..

See? Not everyone like big, muscular men for mates.

File: 1472293408093.jpg (53KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x500px

>/vp/ fetishizing any pokemon with a remotely feminine design
>/vp/ gets mad at anybody doing the same for masculine pokemon

File: Popplio shrug.png (603KB, 733x537px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 733x537px

Eh don't let it get to you. I like litten 3 too
Lord if these things are fake...

File: imgcache0.5557958.jpg (32KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 640x480px

>>28111552
Like this,OP?

File: Beyond saving.png (87KB, 945x768px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 945x768px

>>28111514
>any pokemon with semblance of beauty or femininity is immediately dismissed as waifu bait

File: image.png (57KB, 300x235px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 300x235px

>>28111514
>Any Pokemon with a resemblance to an animal is immediately dismissed as furbait

>>28111514
Blame the human psyche.

>>28111514
>any pokemon with semblance of details is immediately dismissed as overdesigned

File: image.jpg (34KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 480x360px

>>28111514
>semblance of strength and masculinity
That's a very broad term, as even pic-related could qualify for that, and it is clearly not barabait.

I think the category of Pokemon dismissed as bara mostly consists of mons that are
>bulky
>bipedal
>possess human features and/or toned muscles
Like Conkelldur, Litten3, and even MegaSwampert.

>>28111560
Yes. And they think it's a valid complaint when shit like bewear, who is meant to be cute, or mudsdale--a fucking horse, can be made bara like pic related no atter how far they are from being muscular

>>28111904
Is that pic genuine bara-art or just satire?

>>28111901
Have you seen mudsdale? It's quadrupedal and yet

Garchomp is lanky and yet

Conkeldurr fits what you said but does he have bara corruption?

>>28111514
>listen to the """fandom""" ever
Just like whatever pokemon you want, bro. The internet will fetishize anything.

>>28111931
This is directed more to the dteractors, actually

File: snipershrug.png (192KB, 800x459px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 800x459px

Can't we just hate any renditions that make any Pokémon more sexualized than they are?

File: 1468938177165.jpg (258KB, 848x1200px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 848x1200px

>>28111918
Yes it is,by a da artist called Zephleit.He likes bara and shit like that.
>>28111925
>

File: 1472081734509.png (93KB, 534x537px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 534x537px

>any Pokemon that isn't a waifufag happy go lucky cutesy Pokemon is immediately dismissed as edgy

File: image.jpg (83KB, 750x1084px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 750x1084px

>>28111925
Being a masculine looking horse gave Mudsdale automatic porn treatment.

I always thought Garchomp got more vore focus than bara. Plus, like Arcanine, even though it gets porn, it clearly doesn't look designed for it.

And pic related

File: image.jpg (39KB, 530x510px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 530x510px

>>28111995
There's always the grey area of bro Pokemon, that are both badass and somewhat cute

>>28112006
Well that isn't quarter bad as most bara pics posted here. Conkeldurr is still significantly relatively untouched despite """qualifying"""", especially against Mudsdale--new and quadrupedal.

My point is simple, dismissing a design based on fetishizing of other people is not a valid argument against its design. I hate it when people do that

>>28112062
Some Pokemon just have more appeal,ie mudsdale,even if others were "meant" for bara,
conkeldurr.

File: hey big guy (hey little guy).png (28KB, 220x232px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 220x232px

I can't speak for everyone, but my issue personally isn't the concept so much as the execution & sometimes clumsy design..

Litten3's legs look barely functional in comparison to the rest of it's body; i'm waiting for official art to make a final judgment, but I feel like it might topple over at any moment. I don't mind that it's bipedal (even if I would've preferred a quadruped) but I do mind that it seems so weirdly topheavy.

Chestnaught's another one where I actually actually don't mind the core concept, but what gets me are those fucking tube legs - they work on something like Hitmonslinky, but Chestnaught might've benefited from a bit of plating on his shins, similar to what's on his arms. Then they could leave the upper leg as is, keeping with the whole idea of it protecting its underside.

My only problem with Emboar is its head and its typing.

File: 1454706921154.jpg (22KB, 636x398px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 636x398px

>>28111995
>wow you like [dark type mon], anon? Haha you sure are edgy
Does edgy even mean anything anymore?

>>28112684
It never meant anything, so I guess not.

>A Pokémon doesn't have artificial femininity and just looks animal like and neutral, so it "looks Male"

Also known as "Male is the default gender"

I'm talking specifically about "Popplio is not feminine, how can it evolve into Mermaid hurrdurr" just because it doesnt have boobs and eyelashes it's "not feminine"? Fuck off
Also people that have set genders they want Pokémon to be based on their appearance (like Blastoise needs to be Male, Lapras needs to be female) sicken me.

>>28112880
i think you got the wrong website buddy
>>>/Tumblr/

>>28111514
Yes, and?