Isn't it weird that there are Pokémon that haven't

There are 10 year olds that can breed, what's your point anon

>>27945046
if there is hair on the muff she's old enough

>>27945046
it might be a statement on how certain pokemon's lifecycles are.

Nidoran female has been one of the most baffling things, like, there's no way that wasn't intentional, right? Does it maybe mirror those viruses purposefully spread through rabbits to lower their population numbers?

No it was already confirmed age and evolution are separate things in most pokemon species.

>>27945046
Humans can breed by age 13(if they are normal) most animals tend to fuck in their teenage years.

>>27945105
That's just a bug from having them as a separateentry on the dex. That they haven't fixed, because, they are assholes.

>>27945046
Who's this nectar spectre

>>27945141
a bug from them having a separate entry?

why wasn't the male line affected, then?

>>27945227
>Enter exception to genderless don't breed here
>Forget to enter exception to genderless don't breed here
Whoops.

>>27945320
But Nidorina and Nidoqueen are female. It's just that their egg group was set incorrectly.

File: tumblr_nedsw51exP1rc3jkko1_500[1].png (183KB, 500x373px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 500x373px

No. Pokemon that aren't fully evolved can still be old.

Baby Pokemon are analogous to what you're thinking about and they can't breed.

>>27945446
This. They went over it in SMD too. Age and evolutionary stage are not the same.

>>27945446
mechanically, baby pokemon make no sense when compared to the rest of the series.

but I can understand why they were put in.

>>27945046
Evolution is not indicative of age.

>>27945446

That's dumb though. It's like saying caterpillars can get old.

>>27945819
But it's not like that, because pokemon are very much not real animals but are instead crazy fictional monsters.

>>27945046
Yeah that's like eating green tomatoes or fucking a chimp

>>27945139
Most animals are dead by their teenage years