Gentlemen, welcome to the Fightlocke
-The first rule of Fightlocke is you do not talk about Fightlocke
-The second rule of Fightlocke is you DO NOT talk about Fightlocke
-The third rule: someone goes limp or retreats from the fight, you have to release him
-The fourth rule: You have 5 encounters per route. You can catch only ONE of the first five pokémons you find, but from your 6th encounter you won't be catching any.
-The fifth rule: No gifted pokémons or pokémons you are forced to get, except starters.
-The sixth rule: No items
-The seventh rule: No nicknames.
-The eighth & final rule: You have to level up every newly catched pokémon to the level of your strongest.
You HAVE to fight.
this is just an easier nuzlocke, Kys.
>>27824064
except for the fact that if you retreat a pokémon then you will have to release him. Tactical sacrifice is not that easy
>can't nicknames your Pokemon
Nuzlockers are truly the worst
Yeah this is shit
>>27824074
you mean switching out?
>>27824049
I think I'll just go and have sex instead lol
>>27824049
>-The sixth rule: No items
>-The seventh rule: No nicknames.
So I can't use Super Potions before going up to the next Elite Four?
Without nicknaming them, I don't feel any lost when boxing my mon.
This is just the more retarded locke.
>>27824049
You see, OP, the difference between this and a Nuzloke run is that a Nuzloke run isn't incredibly tedious.
>>27824049
Fightlocke? More like Tardlocke.
>>27827011
Yes
>>27824049
>No nicknames
Stopped caring there
>>27824049
>not doing a cumlocke
>>27828856
Wat dis?
What are the rules?
>>27824049
Easily the most retarded nuzlocke variation I have seen yet. Kill yourself.
>>27824049
>welcome to the grindlocke
>>27828834
that's fucking stupid.
>>27828924
>Not fighting
>being a pussy
>>27829039
There's a difference between 'tactical sacrifice' and making an arbitrary set of challenge rules even more arbitrary and tedious.
You aren't adding any challenge to the game, you're just making it more annoying to get through. Fuck you.