>shills will defend this, but shit on vanillux, garbodor, voltorb, muk, and magnemite
What do you dislike about it that the others don't have too?
>>27792862
This series is called Pocket MONSTERS, not Pocket Animals.
Pretty much every monster collecting series has object based Pokemon, but I've never seen anyone complain except when Pokemon does it.
>>27792862
Muk, Garbodor, and Magnemite are atleast original designs. Shitty but still original. The rest are literally just objects with faces put on them
>>27792862
I think they're all neat.
>>27792932
Op made that clear already, anon. Your opinion is pretty much irrelevant
>>27792932
Isn't a trash bag just an object? original my ass.
>>27792862
I'll defend all those Pokemon you listed except the Sandcastle
I mean it's sorta neat but also very funky; I can see why people might dislike it a lot.
I like Magnemite, Vanilluxe, Voltorb, and Sandcastle-kun.
Muk can suck a bag of dicks for all I care though.
He designed this pronbably because he designed many ghost Pokémon.
>>27793050
it's pictures like this that make me hate being a pokemon fan
>still defending Ohmura and co.
>>27793075
You're welcome.
>>27792862
They could've gone a lot further with the design. It just looks like a sad sandcastle, they need to play up the 'haunted' aspect more. Take elements from haunted houses too. Make the windows LOOK LIKE EYES, not just have them be eyes.
>>27793072
>Those Pokemon lines
Hey, 6/9 ain't too bad. Golembros, vulture and spookytree are great.
>>27792862
It's a matter of preference, shit for brains. You can like or dislike any Pokemon and it doesn't matter.
Just because you disagree with someone else and their opinion doesn't make that person wrong. Most 6 year olds have learned that lesson by that point in their life. What's your excuse?
>>27793163
I saw this guy on Disney XD
>>27792862
No, I like them all. In fact Garbodor is my favorite gen 5 pokemon.
>>27793019
Yes anon, it's a sandcastle ghost, you have very good observation skills.
>>27792862
All of the Pokemon you mentioned have interesting and unique designs
>>27793163
I'd rather get one of those other than mom's sand castle
>>27792862
Well yes. I mean, we have people like you that'll defend the latter but shit on the former, so we need to balance this somehow, right?
>>27793019
>LITERALLY THE LOWEST THEY'VE STOOPED WITH "INANIMATE OBJECT WITH EYES"
Nah, the lowest is when they put eyes (and mouth) on a Pokeball; you can't get any lower than that.
>>27793253
then play that instead of pokemon
because you have the tastes of the current generation of 9 yr olds
>>27792862
What if I defend it, Vanilluxe, Garbodor, Voltorb, Muk, and Magnemite?
I'm really confused about what everyone is losing there shit over with this thing
I actually UNDERSTOOD the vanilluxe/ garbodor thing back in black/white days here, even though I loved them
This is literally just an "Eh" mon, its design makes sense and fits the idea but isnt special.
like 50% of the pokemon in every game are at this tier, its nothing to lose your shit over
>>27793293
>Nah, the lowest is when they put eyes (and mouth) on a Pokeball; you can't get any lower than that.
It's a fucking chest monster. Sure it's not the most creative, but voltorb's design is one of the only designs in the game that actually directly impacts gameplay.
>>27793335
Complaining about objectmons is basically a meme at this point.
I like sandcastle and ice cream ;_;
>>27793357
Doesn't really change the fact that it's a pair of eyes and a mouth on a Pokeball though. Again, you can't get any lower than that.
I hate neither though
Don't worry anons, final evolution incoming.
>>27792862
I think it's super cute! I'm planning on using it!
>>27793163
Why do you always post and say the same thing? Are you that butthurt about yokai watch?
>>27792862
I'll defend all of them
>>27792913
Hagurumon is a great design, but it doesn't work as a pokémon. This is pretty much true for all Ultimate and beyond Digimon.
The same applies to this sandcastle, it doesn't work as a pokémon. This is something I would have expected to encounter in Super Mario Sunshine.
>>27792862
>I don't like this so no one can
>>27792862
This thing is klink tier shit, but shit-mons will always be fun to play with just because of how weird they are
>>27793019
You could literally do this for almost any pokemon.
>>27793852
>doesn't work as a pokemon
Wtf is this meme? It doesn't even make sense.
>>27794121
Using "spirit possessing object" as an excuse to make all sort of objects come to life more and more often has gradually changed Ghost from one of my favorite types to the lower end.
>>27794183
It looks bad when lined up with other pokémon.
How are you too dumb to understand that?
>>27793529I had more fun with that game than I should have
>>27792862
Anyone have the image of this guy as a Kirby enemy?
>>27792862
Here's hoping it looks better in 3D like every other revealed pokemon artwork has been
>>27792862
Yeah I agree it's a bad design, but it doesn't mean the game is ruined.
>>27793163
those monsters fit within the yokai universe; your post is autistic
>>27793102
>Raikou
>Dog
>>27794121
ghosts mons have went from gender and haunter to muh *insert random inanimate object here*, it's just a copout for a good Pokemon design
the people that come up with these ideas should be immediately fired
I really like its prevo but the big guy looks too much like a regular old sandcastle. Maybe if there was a dex explanation like Shirodesuna seeing people building sandcastles so it disguises itself as one to lure in victims it would be a little more understandable.
On the plus side, it totally looks like it could be a kirby boss or something so that's bonus cuteness points
>>27794385
gengar* sry autocorrect
>>27794385
a black sphere with gas and a spiky purple thing are so creative wow
>>27792862
I love all Pokemon anon
Except for druddigon, fuck druddigon
>>27792862
I like all of them.
>Over 720 Pokemon designs
>Autists get pissed at the idea that some of them don't cater to them
Pathetic
I understand not caring about tons of Pokemon, but being mad at a design in particular at this point, when there is obviously no rules of what can and cannot be a Pokemon, is pathetic.
>>27794385
Gastly and Gengar are objectmons though. Gastly is a fart and Gengar is Clefable's shadow.
>>27794507
>if you don't like one Pokémon then you're not a fan
>>27794459
Haunter and Gengar are pretty creative designs, there aren't many things that look much like them.
Wouldn't a shill defend EVERY design, not just one specific one?
>>27794402
>>27794385
DID YOU JUST ASSUME MY GENGAR?!?!?
>>27794507
>GF can do no wrong, as long as at least one person in the world likes a shitty design then it's great
>>27794560
not if they're shilling for the new games specifically
>>27794545
>>27794597
Did I say that? Not at all.
But the whiners who react as if one design they don't like is ruining the franchise F O R E V E R are sad little shits.
>>27794239
>>27794617
So they're only partly a shill.
>>27793072
>4 is now many
>>27794567
took me like 5 minutes to get that
>>27794633
>But the whiners who react as if one design they don't like is ruining the franchise F O R E V E R are sad little shits.
The thing is nobody in the thread said that, but you're acting like people disliking the sandcastle do just that
>>27792862
Well I like Voltorb, Electrode, Magnemite, and this
I dislike Garbador, Vanilluxe and the Grimer line so get at me
>>27794459
but it's original; i look at that and think hey that's a unique creature in the pokemon universe
i look at the sand castle and think .. ? like some dead guy possessed a pile of sand? the fuck is it? it's not an original pokemon; who's to say the next inanimate object isn't possessed by the same vague entity? so basically there's an infinite number of random retarded objects that can be possessed and they'll never run out of ideas!!11!!11
really low quality stuff
>>27794643
Not really. It's like a Fallout 4 shill saying:
>having so many conversation options, and actully seeing the full dialogue beforehand was too complicated, no it's much easier with simple bullet points!
Which means you're talking shit about an older game(that doesn't generate money anymore) to make the newer look better and earn money.
You're still a full-blown shill.
>>27794640
thanks senpai. Shirodesuna is a great Kirby enemy, but a shitty Pokemon
>>27792885
It's not a good design. There is no theme behind the head shape.
At least Garbodor was a neat concept with the bag "exploding" to show the junk.
>>27792862
I just want to say that Muk is awesome and I'm tired of you fucking faggots always shitting on it in these types of threads
Its a ghost. Thats all it takes to make it okay for me. if Vanilluxe or Garbordor were a ghost-possessed icecream and ghost-possessed garbage, They'd be okay too.
A living sandcastle is stupid, a haunted sandcastle is neat.
>>27794121
>>27794185
So more spooky spirits or the undead as themselves then?
Dugtrio, Magneton, Dunsparce, Spoink, Spinda, Woobat, Swoobat, Roggenrola line, Munna line, Elemental monkeys, Tumpole line, Timburr line, Throh, Sawk, Alomomola, Trubbish line, Vanillite line, (Cofragrigrus?), Foongus line, Ferroseed line, Motherfking Klink line, Stunfisk, Golett line, Pawniard line, Heatmor(why the fk does this one exist?), Chesnaught, Bunnelby line, Swirlix line, Malamar, Binacle line, Zygarde 100%.
They were taking a dump when designing those. What's next? A shit-pokemon(literally shit). Hurry up GF, it's a good idea! Next gen I wanna see a shit-pokemon, a dildo-pokemon and while you're at it create a pokemon that resembles the 69 position in kamasutra.
>>27795363
Both, spooky spirits and demons are great. But literal undeads like a zombie humanoid, zombie horse or zombie dragon would be great, as long as they don't overdo it.
I....I like the sandcastle.. alot.. it's cute. I don't like Electrode or voltorb, not because muh shitty design, it just never stood out to me. I had a Vanniluxe, only cause it was a fucking snowcone. Rad! Muk was my favorite pouson type back in Red Blue, and i didn't even know Mags was hated on?
>it does not appeal to me therefore it is bad
>>27795088
>defending a terrible design because of an in-universe explanation
Nah it's shit, sand nigger.
>>27795395
bitter lil bitch
also fuck you heatmor is an ant eater and it's badass
>>27795546
you're shit
stop being mad at a kids game god you must be insufferable irl
>>27792862
>Sandcastle
>Vanillux
>Garbodor
>Voltorb
>Muk
>Magnemite
I like them all except Vanillux. I don't think it's bad but I don't like it.
>>27795608
>u mad XD
you must be 14 irl
>>27794225
youre not alone.
>>27795964
Not even that other dude but...
OPINIONS!!!!!
>>27795088
How do you like the new ghost/fairy pokemon they just leaked?
>>27792862
I like Sandcastle, but dislike Muk, Electrode and Vanillux. Not their lines, just them.
Muk and Electrode are lazy "it just gets bigger" evolutions of two pokemon I'm already not that keen on, and Vanillux just looks silly to me with the two scoops even if I like the previous two forms.
>>27796031
>hiding behind muh opinions
That guy is saying that it doesn't matter how shit a design is as long as the lore is "good".
While it is an opinion, it's an incredibly shit one.
>>27793019
Oh, but the same thing on a Pokeball is fine?
But people don't shit on grimer or magnemite or whatever when mons like this get made, it's the other way around. But then when people point out that hey, this isn't the first mon of it's kind, people get butthurt because they can't refute a point and hate something for no other reason then to join a shit-fueled bandwagon of retardation. It's the same thing with Gen 5 in general on this board. Gotta hate it, otherwise you won't fit in!
Fucking idiots.
>>27793357
Foongus does the whole chest monster thing far, far better
>>27795395
>>27795546
>STILL shitting on pokemon designs
Fine, get a bigger load of it
LOOK AT MY OC
>>27800024
Worst objectmon
At least it has decent porn potential
>>27793019
wow someone is salty af
nigga calm down
Why don't people get salty over rock and grass pokemon? Literally just flowers with face and rocks with faces
Literally all of those designs are fine.
>>27792862
Good. They're all shit designs but the sandcastle is GOAT. I mean it's a possessed sand castle. That's just brilliant.
>>27793072
He designed one of the best lines in the game, a great line, and then 2 ok ones
omg ppl r so fukin angry XDD
>>27800224
>mfw Vanilluxe was just a fluke
>>27800317
Vullaby looks pretty stupid
I'm fine with ice cream mon but I forgot it was 3-stage and don't think it should be.
Remove one of them, the line would still be fine no matter which one you removed.
>>27800330
Agreed, but really, only final stages matter, and Mandibuzz was cool from the moment I laid eyes on it.
Being fine with an ice cream mon invalidates your opinion, though.
>>27792862
Sandcastle is a predator. It's a ghost that has possessed sand and adorned itself with decorations to trick its prey into approaching.
Vanillux looks like ice cream for no good reason. All the others are alright.
>>27792932
>muk is an original design
>literally the rpg slime trope
>the others are just objects with faces
>muk is literally just slime with a face
yeah ok dude whatever helps you sleep at night
captcha: select all images with ice cream. topical.
I seriously thought this was fake and was from Yokai Watch when I seen it. I don't particularly like the design, but the dex entry more than redeems it.
My biggest hope is that it makes a presence competitively so people will stop shitting on it.
But you know what's gonna come,
>Pokemon is so bad now days
>just look at garbagemon
>just look at icecream mon
>just look at sandcastlemon
I don't know why gamefreak would give fuel to this.
>>27793179
>XD
Get out.
Consider the following...
>>27801218
>disliking all those Pokemon
Shit taste
>>27792932
Please tell me this is a joke
>defend this
>is a castle
Is that why you made the thread OP? For that one joke? You cheeky cunt.
>>27801218
>doduo
No.
>>27793852
I'm usually on the side against shit like the ice cream line, but that gear thing "works as a pokemon".
>>27801216
Are you this retarded, anon?
>>27792862
>not liking every single funny looking pokemon
They're the sames who're going to tell you pokemon isn't a child game and is a really mature game for mature mind and mature body
I like it desu
>>27792862
What if I like all those designs including the sand castle?
What sucks is I am actually OK with the concept of a sandcastle Pokemon, but the design is so fucking bad that it ruins it for me.
>>27803870
Oh shit another JoJo-fag
>it does not appeal to me therefore it is bad
>>27801169
because game freak don't care. it's likely japanese fans don't care either. a lot of western fans don't care. so why should they all stop designing/receiving fun designs because of some whiny cry babies who don't like fun and don't like "objects" as pokemon.. even though objects have been pokemon since the very start? it makes no sense to cater to the retards who have a stick up their ass and think pokemon has to be nintendogs
>>27801216
it's a channel you fucking doofus
>>27793163
this one looks kinda cool actually I wouldn't mind more food pokemon if they makem cool like this dude
>>27792862
Literally only unovabortions defend it and you're posting in the biggest unovabortion nest in the world.
>>27803656
>>27804799
How new are you?
>>27795088
Vanilluxe isn't even ice cream. Its a snow covered icicle that looks like it. It isn't manmade.
>>27804913
> Literally food is kinda cool
> "B-buh Vanilluxe is bad because!"
Seriously, if that guy hasn't angry face you say it is an ugly design and tasteless.
I'll have to see. I really disliked Pyukumuku when I first saw the low quality scan of it, but I've since warmed up to it after seeing it in game.
That being said, they didn't even attempt to give Hippowdon sand so we'll see how bad it turns out.
>>27792862
>>shills will defend this, but shit on vanillux, garbodor, voltorb, muk, and magnemite
The cut off point is Garbodor.
Remember, it's only okay to shit on gen 1.
>>27794667
>4/37
The dude has desgined more than a tenth from all existing ghost pokemon. It's not a huge nomber, but its considerable.