How to instantly invalidate a Pokémon "leak":
>Grass/Fire with implied pepper motif
Did you think Volcanion was also fake because it was an unimaginative Fire/Water based on steam?
>>27623242
Because a burning tree make way fucking more sense, isn't it?
>>27623274
Yeah, it does.
>>27623242
How to instantly invalidate a Pokémon "leak":
>Grass/Fire Mega Sunflora
>Grass/Fire Alola Sunflora
>>27623274
if the plant reproduces through pyriscence, then yes it does.
"You can choose to believe this or not"
"There's a dolphin Pokemon named Delphin, porpoise, porpuin, dolfin, delphon"
>Everything is dual type and unique
When there's no evidence or valid explanation on why the leak is real.
>>27623274
>not wanting a swampy/gassy/fiery monster