Why are faggots still in denial that these aren't 100% confirmed yet? I'm not saying the actual evos wont be similar to them, but they defiantly won't be 100% exactly like them. Stop lying to yourself, these aren't the real final evos.
inb4 B-but the girl was!!!! D:
>>27569196
>>27569196
>defiantly
Post discarded.
>>27569196
Can't wait for November and you denial fags get BTFO. Mallow is in the Litten picture and these were leaked weeks before Mallow was shown. If you honestly think that the artists somehow managed to draw a perfect replica if Mallow by coincidence, you are autistic.
>>27569196
Why do you care so much?
I'm genuinely curious.
So fucking what if people deny it?
Why are you giving them (You)s?
Are you underage?
Are you aware that idiots like you are what enables shitposters?
>>27569283
>implying it's not beta art
>implying these are just discarded designs
When you think about it, that's exactly why the leaker got his hands on that sheet. It got discarded, and nobody cared to make sure that nobody took it and released it on the internet since it's rejected designs.
I want a post where all denialfags post so we can laugh (with)(of) them at November.
>>27569196
If you want to get autistic about it, only El Tigre is confirmed real.
>>27569315
We have a winner.
>>27569196
It'd probably because these are probably the most elaborate compared to practically every other previous leak that was proven real from past generations.
It makes it much harder to believe they wouldn't finalize them when they've done so for much more barebones looking "drafts"
>>27569196
I really hope you're right OP. Throughout all of the games, I've always liked at least two of the starters, but these new ones all look so bad. I'm not a barafag so Litten is really disappointing to me because I was originally planning on choosing it. The Rowlet evo just looks stupid and it's concept is incredibly lame. Popmaid isn't too bad, I guess. Honestly though, I'm either boxing my starter or choosing Litten and not letting it evolve if this shit is 100% real.
>>27569315
>Actually this retarded
kek
>>27569234
Please tell me the tiger is Fire/Dark, not Fire/Fighting. We don't need yet another Blaziken.
>>27569196
You have to be over 18 to use this site OP.
It's an anime reference sheet (Ash and Pikachu are there). The anime definitely already started production. These diesigns are final.
>>27569196
BITCH THAT'S WHAT IT MEANS TO NOT 100% CONFIRMED!
confirmed or not, these threads are ruining /vp/
I hope that theyre real just to get killer queen as a pokemon
>>27569315
>reaching this much
>>27569315
So why did Masuda/Sugimori block someone on Twitter for posting them THEN went back to unblock them after everyone heard the news? If he was just annoying him would have just stayed blocked.
Also I have also heard of people being C&D'd because of these on /vp/
>>27569234
Sperg sporg
>>27570823
Biggotry.
>>27570793
It's not reaching when it's literally the most likely scenario possible.
>>27570811
Because the only real thing in those leaks was Mallow
These shitty designs werent retained and the salty artist posted them presenting it as leak
And now that Mallow is official, theres no reason to block the false leaks anymore
>>27570923
Too bad that's probably not what happened.
>>27569979
does this mean Ash's Litten carries around a table?
cause i'm sold if it does
>>27570974
This is bait sweetie and I'm not falling for it
>>27569196
I am loving the leaf type; very hard to see its eyes though; are they the white or the orange thing? The fire type might be cool too. Not totally sold on it but I can see what's happening there.
>>27571021
There is no chance that even if Ash did get Litten it would have evolved twice by at most the twentieth episode of the season (and most likely much earlier). It's most likely a character of the day Pokemon.
>>27570893
Ignoramus.
The concept art isn't just for the anime; it's just a generic concept sheet of character interactions and basic design elements. An actual reference for the anime team to use would be much cleaner, have less doodles scattered about (as they detract from important model details for the Pokemon), no colour codes, and would have an official name for the Pokemon.
>>27571456
Maybe it's for merchandise manufacturing (for things like plushes and figures), that would back up the sales stuff in that thread posted yesterday and also. The no names thing might be to stop someone from leaking the names.