There's people on this board RIGHT NOW, who think this retarded ass cat's paws look good.
Goddamn, why did you betray us, GF?
It's called opinions, ever heard of it?
Its not even confirmed yet
>>27509744
That there cat isn't a pokemon, anon.
It's an abomination.
>>27509787
That's your opinion. Please don't get your jimmies in a bunch because some people just might actually like this desgin.
>>27509643
Gf saw these leaked and used one of their other designs :^)
>>27509643
Naw dog, I love my Lucha Litten
>>27509643
I'm starting to like it more on the sole basis that so many of you fags can't suck it up
"Wah gamefreak betrayed us by doing something unexpected, don't they know that we dictate what the new pokemon have to evolve into!?" Grow up
>>27509643
>>27510987
>unexpected
I agree with you for the most part, but not this.
Litten getting big and standing up is something we all were expecting deep down, with either dread or anticipation.
Bipedalism should just be considered the main theme of the Fire starters at this point, since GameFreak doesn't seem willing to go that route.
>>27511980
By "that route" I meant quadruped fire starter evolution
>>27511022
Oh yeah, keep posting it, it'll sure get funnier. Eventually.
You faggots actually care about the paws when the fucking clown seal just became fucking the little mermaid?
>>27509643
>Goddamn, why did you betray us, GF?
Shitty edgelord cat evolves into shittier edgelord cat. I don't see the betrayal.
>>27509643
I don't mind these designs....but are we seriously getting another fire/fighting type? Fuck this shit man. Feels good to be an owl bro.
>>27512268
It's fire/dark, he's a heel.
Fucking Tiger Mask, man. Or if you're too young to remember Tiger Mask, think Tiger Millionaire.
>>27512268
Fire/Dark, don't worry. "Lippity Litten, please no fire/fighting kitten" will work
>>27512315
>>27512306
Ok that's fine then. Saw the wrestling motif and just assumed.
It looks so goddamn awful to me but I'm happy for those that actually like it. Assuming they're not just pretending.
>>27509643
>there are people here right now who don't take this as a sign these "leaks" are fake