Why does everyone fawn over double battles so much? I see people

>>27386013
-The official tournament format, VGC is doubles, which automatically gains it more players than it probably deserves
-A lot of game mechanics work very differently in doubles compared to in singles
-Team synergy and support roles play a much more active role in doubles, given that it's very reasonable to have a support Pokémon working well with a sweeper, and two Pokémon out which cover each other's weaknesses better
-The "meme teams" you're talking about are probably strategies. That's generally considered a good thing.

>>27386013
>meme teams trying to outmeme each other
Speak English you underage mongoloid, how are we supposed to see your problem with doubles if that's all you give us?

I prefer doubles because in my opinion, there's more room for strategy, what with a bunch of moves and abilities suddenly becoming viable and effective. Just my ten cents, I don't have a problem with singles. Plus, VGC is fun when it isn't fucked by bad rules like this year.

>>27386070
>VGC is fun when it isn't fucked by bad rules like every other year.

ftfy

File: 006.png (116KB, 300x262px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 300x262px

Because single battles, the actual mainstay of the franchise is broken and utter shit.

Why do I want to see constant switching out/switching in using even more meme tactics than any other mode??

Maybe if single battles were set only with a couple more rule changes (dont ask me I dont play competitve, its cancer) we might be able to have traction, but as it stands its such shit.

>>27386013
>meme teams trying to outmeme each other.
DO I FIT IN GUYS? DO I?! DO I FUCKING FIT IN YET!!!?!!?
Fuck you.

>>27386013
Because I like playing battles that aren't centered on switching every two turns.