I've only played pokemon red back when it came out. I want to play a more recent one, which one should i start?
>>27385684
Black 2/White 2 is probably the best one for gameplay, but you may want XY or ORAS for something more up to date.
you can play the newest ones (x&y) and you'll figure everything out just fine. just make sure you turn off the exp. share if you are above the age of 15.
heartgold for the nintendo DS
>>27385684
Heart Gold/Soul SIlver 'cause are excellent games and are the sequels for Red/Blue
then Black 2/ White 2, great games
then move out of the franchise
>>27385684
Black 2 and White 2
>>27385684
BW2
Platinum
HGSS
Then wait SM.
>>27385706
I suggest this, but don't care about turning off the exp share. It's not like grinding against wild mons would make the gameplay more interesting
>>27385752
Bait, do not follow advice
>>27387223
They're the "main" Pokémon games which sold less in all the Pokémon history, consider this before playing
>>27385684
dont bother, they dont even look like pokemon anymore.
X and Y were aiming for the crowd that dropped the series. I would definitely recommend checking one of those out first.
HG/SS, then move on to OR/AS.
/vp/ talks tons of shit about OR/AS, but I am playing through AS for the first time and I have been having a blast so far.
>>27387223
shouldnt you start with black/white then play black2/white2?
>>27385706
Awwww exp share sure got somebody mad.
>>27385684
Don't listen anything this faggot >>27389655 said, he's baiting.
>They sold less than other games so they must be bad
This alone proves he's a troll or a complete mongoloid.
>>27389854
Prove I'm wrong. B2/W2 were, in the "main" games (i mean across all the R/B/W G/S/C R/S/E FR/LG D/P/PL HG/SS B/W/B2/W2 X/Y OR/AS) the ones who sold less. It's a fact, not an opinion. They were good? Sure they were better than B/W, but they still sold less
>>27390208
They sold less because Black and White 1 were shit meaning people didn't want to play the sequels