I noticed something. None of gen 5,6 and now 7 pokemon uses

File: 689Barbaracle.png (147KB, 410x410px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 410x410px

>None of gen 5,6 and now 7 pokemon uses 1 gen angry eyes anymore

>>27309491
Good example! Not the gen 1 eyes exactly but still.
Maybe that's why many people like it so much.

File: consider.jpg (44KB, 480x156px)

44KB, 480x156px

>>27309641
>like it so much

Barbaracle is one of the most hated pokemon in Gen 6.

File: 533Gurdurr.png (198KB, 567x567px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 567x567px

>>27309457
>None of gen 5,6 and now 7 pokemon uses 1 gen angry eyes anymore
?

It's true that eyes are the expressive part of the face. If you want to tell what emotion someone is currently expressing, you look at their eyes.

File: 555Darmanitan.png (908KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

908KB, 1280x1280px

>if it's not like genwun it's bad
Please go back to facebook.

>>27309763
>and starting from gen 4 there is a huge focus on eyes to look unique and give pokemon a character
Anti-genwunners are pathetic.

>>27309457
Patrat

Sucker

>>27309491
Mega Man boss.

>>27309657
> most hated
> Hating on Barbarabro

When did everyone's taste get so shit?

>>27309657
>Barbaracle is one of the most hated pokemon in Gen 6.
this is not a fact. just your opinion

>>27310126
It's hard for me to wrap my head around the idea that genwunners may actually dislike the newer pokemon because they have more character.

>>27310126
go back to facebook

>>27309763
Op never said that

Darmanitan is shit btw

>>27309763
what is up with the colouring on this? the lighting snaking up the arms makes no sense

>>27310511
>when did taste get shit

This place was always full of shit taste.

>>27310518
It is pretty factual that alotta people on /vp/ dislike barbaracle. And that alotta people on /vp/ have shit taste

>>27310518
I've never seen anyone express anything but disgust for barbaracle before this thread.

>>27311080

Maybe its a smoldering/flame effect like with the eyebrows?

Im reaching here. what IS up with that??

>>27309457
Yep, I've noticed this, too. I like that they're trying to diversify Pokemon. It's better than "if it's angry, give it triangle eyes; if it's cute, give it black, sclera-less eyes; if it's dopey, give it big round eyes."

>>27311080
>the lighting in a drawing of it is off therefore the Pokemon is bad

>>27309457
That's a good thing, right?
Angry eyes are just "meh" to me.

>>27314213
Genwunner stop false flagging.

>>27311080
An area where hair can't grow fully because of the fire pattern left by his punches? I never noticed that before, how odd.

>>27311080
That is standard sugimori style.it doesn't really have any lighting connotations. It's something he does on long linear features that are in full light.

>>27309763
OP never said it's bad. Why are you anti genwunners so fucking sensitive?

>>27309657
I like barbacle I just wish his head was t a hand, or atleast it could be a hand without a thumb its still cool though

>>27314089
i like it :D

File: 250px-Mudsdale.png (51KB, 250x250px)

51KB, 250x250px

>None of gen 5,6 and now 7 pokemon uses 1 gen angry eyes anymore

>>27315702
>>27314089
>>27309491

Literally none of these look like the Gen 1 eyes.

>>27315711
which is good because pokemon shouldn't be toriyama ripoffs

>>27309457
>from gen 4 there is a huge focus on eyes to look unique and give pokemon a character.
and how is this bad exactly?

>>27315793
See >>27314917

>>27309657
Are you joking? He bows like a freaking knight when you feed him in Amie. He's top tier stuff man. Just wish he was better competitively.

Also, to support >>27309641, he's also a "3 first-stagers stuck together" extrapolation. Same general concept as magneton and dugtrio

DBZ eyes suck