>final evolution >high HP >high retreat cost >it's

>>27131372
>110 HP

>>>>>>high

Are you dumb? Have you not played in 11 years?

File: OPs examples.jpg (251KB, 1112x1032px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1112x1032px

>uncommons are too strong
Your examples are all weaker than rares.
But you're right that the game is ruined by good cards being common, imagine if there was a common that went around doing 200 damage for a single energy attachment on the first turn. The game could never survive.

>>27132082
Honestly my problem is just that they look like they should be rares but they aren't.
I want to put them in a sleeve outside my common pile but I can't because they're fucking common for some reason

>>27131771
I know it's not that high but it's relatively high for non-ex cards

>>27132220
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Simisage_(BREAKthrough_6)
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Simipour_(BREAKthrough_42)
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Simisear_(BREAKthrough_24)

So you're the type of person who enjoys pulling the monkeys that used to be commons in the Japanese set? The sets have enough junk rares already and you want more?

It's because the TCG is irredeemable garbage at this point.
It's just power creep without stopping or attempting to balance anything.
Why even bother?

>>27132362
No I already have a reverse holiday rare simipour that I despise. It's a shit card, with low HP AND shit art. It doesnt look like it should be rare.
The weezing and that lapras and snorlax do look like they should be rare.