Please just SHUT UP ABOUT ME. I've fucking HAD IT and I

>>26962161
Based Owltair.

File: 1467335517228.png (25KB, 576x327px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 576x327px

>>26962161

>>26963267
10/10

For whoever thinks Roothoot actually was the prediction of Rowlet, which of the two following situations seem most probable?

one fake starter, among many of which had been made, coincidentally turned out to fit the name of a poke that leaked roughly 6 weeks later, and was then revived since people knew it would be easy to use

or

from an unknown source, allegedly 2chan, a pokemon was leaked, only as a drawing that had the right typing and colors, but details like eyes, shape, beak and color distribution and even angle/stance of the pokemon was completely wrong, for some sort of reason

>>26963267
0/10
copyright kicking the fakemon

File: 1466037555511.gif (747KB, 408x172px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 408x172px

>>26962161
>I CORRECTLY PREDICTED ROOTHOOT WAS REAL

But he's not.

File: these_assholes.png (63KB, 774x306px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 774x306px

>>26963317
I'm pretty sure we all know how it went

The japanese names were copyrighted, like 20 people made a Grass Bird/Fire Cat/Water thing combo, and Deviantart users were amazed and thought everyone was psychic afterwards.

Roothoot was one of them, except one of the ones passed off as a fake leak, from a group that didn't even get the cat part right no less.

Pic related

>>26963317
>>26963363
Finn Owl predated the trademarks by several weeks, newfags.

File: citronicgearon.png (27KB, 204x279px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 204x279px

>>26962161

>Wants people to shut up about Rootcunt
>Posts entire new topic about it

HMMMMMMMMMMM

>>26963385
Well he's still fake, so do you really care?

File: 44MOVINGGOALPOSTS.jpg (77KB, 385x500px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 385x500px

>>26963385
>Someone got the species of one of the starters right
>"I PREDICTED IT!"

>>26963402
>>26963415
Where did I imply that I even cared about it? Just pointing out that you are either newfags or /v/eddit tourists talking out of your asses.

File: 1438144308545.gif (3MB, 279x350px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 279x350px

>>26963440
>"Where did I imply that I even cared about it?"
Fucking amateur.

>>26963267
Why is Rowlet beating up his design concept?

>>26963440
I don't use reddit and I'm legitimately scared to go on any other board besides /vp/

The animal and color palate were correctly "guessed", I say Roothoot was half a leak, a little too similar to be a shot in the dark.

I think SOMEHOW the description of Rowlet got put out there and someone drew Roothoot to the description. Sort of like those magazine interpretations of the Gen 2 dex that were drawn from the leaked sprites back in the day.

>>26963510
You should try /hm/ or /y/

>>26963363
>>26963385
did you two even read my post?
first known mention of Roothoot is from march, first leak of the names are from April, so Roothoot clearly came first

What i'm saying, is that Roothoot was just one among 1000 at first, nothing special, but when the names leaked, some people decided to bring back the owl because it fit one of the names, which would inevitably result in a shitstorm later

There were no predictions, it was just some people using what had already been done, with new info, for the setup of a future shitstorm

>>26963537
maybe, but all the details are wrong, that's what's bugging me
the whole bodyshape is wrong
the eyes are all wrong
the beak is barely even a beak at all
there's no bowtie
There's barely any green in Rowlet at all, whereas nearly the whole Roothoot is green

Sure, they're both owls, and yes they both have brown and green on them, but if someone were to describe Rowlet, don't you think they'd have done a bit of a better job than that?