How high on the ladder do you have to be to be considered "good"

File: 1350565137412.jpg (43KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 500x500px

>>26760635
>implying serious battlers play on PS!
>implying anyone gives two fucks about a rank that means literally nothing to anyone but a couple of faggot neckbeards

wew lad

>>26760635
>Showdown
AHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>26760643
b-but I want to git gud against other people, yet I'm afraid to go to a cart tournament.

It depends on the tier, doesn't it? It takes more points to be worth dick in OU than in UU, in my opinion.

1700 to be considered good
1900+ is considered really good but instead of being admired and loved for being high ranked you will be hated for being a stallfaggot.

File: 610863_1293991650327_full.jpg (47KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 500x281px

What's the point in giving a shit about high laddering when Showdown resets the numbers every month or so?

Furthermore, all those asshole on the top 50 of whatever tier just copypaste teams of the highest usage. It's not like they use any Pokemon they actually like or try different move sets. It's all for the sake of laddering and that's fucking boring.

>>26760643
>I went on ps once and got btfo, t-theyre faggots!

>>26760781
>1700 to be considered good
>1900+ is considered really good
Shit I still struggle and it will take me more time personally to reach that. At least Im decent enough to enjoy my battles and the meta.

>>26760643

>>implying serious battlers play on PS!
And what simulator do you believe "serious" battlers use?

>>26761176
PS rankings are a joke because the way to take top spot if you're decent is to make new accounts until you win enough to get it, people intentionally use this to reset their mmr