Be honest. Does he need an evolution?
I really need a reason to like this thing.
>>26705499
It looks like different parts of toys mashed together. So yeah an evolution or mega would be nice
He needs a mega
>>26705499
I think it's cool, Its 3D model makes it look a lot better. Although an evolution would be nice, a mega is much more likely to happen.
Literally a LEGO stack.
Megas were a mistake. Everyone believes that everything just needs a mega now, instead of an actual evolution.
>>26705563
Blame Game Freak for that. They keep designing mons that design wise look like they need an evolution, but stat wise would be broken if they got a permanent evolution due to their stats already going on par with most final evolutions anyway. If they did give those mons permanent evolutions, then the stat increase would have to minuscule.
no. It is the only non legend dragon without an evo chain and I like that
>>26705563
Okay but, Druddy actually needs one
>>26705499
yeah OBVIOUSLY
>>26705527
what if this gargolye-chimaera-dragon thing is a nod to bulette/landshark, rust monster and owlbear, eh?