Does anyone have these in lossless? I can only find XY lossless,

>>26636613
What is the point of lossless other than more space used? Is there really a noticeable difference in quality?

>>26637075
Because you're already coming from a lossy source, it being converted from a lossy to a lossless then to a lossy again means it sounds even worse

>>26637075
>Using shitty mp3s

File: LOL.png (658KB, 625x790px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 625x790px

>>26636613
Here's the highest quality i could find.
Took some digging.

>>26639035
>Lossless
Wew lad

>>26636613
What's lossless?

>>26640053
How old are you?

>>26640061
20?

>>26640073
When were you born?

>>26640088
Fucking Christ I know how old I am just tell me what it is holy fuck.

>>26640096
Are your parents by any chance related?
Look, we're anonymous. I won't get mad at you admitting your real age.

>>26640113
>Forgetting Google exists
Okay, fine, I'm retarded.

File: 1461512656383.png (461KB, 865x788px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 865x788px

>>26640130
Who are you quoting? If you're of age then lets have sex.

>>26640147
Anyway
Does the lossless format make digital music like this any better?

>>26636613
>and we all know my opinion about gen 6's music
No, we literally don't even know who you are.