One more week til more news. What are you hoping for? I'm

>>26482335
>I'm hoping for confirmation of 100+ new non megas
LOL why would they do that?

>>26482335
why would you need to demo a game that hasn't changed for over 2 decades

>>26482335
I think 90-110 new pokes and a couple new evos and megas for existing pokes would be great.
I'd like to know if they are making changes to type effectiveness like they did with steel.

File: 1444859759170.gif (451KB, 376x320px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 376x320px

Synchro evolutions.

>>26482344
Did you forget the ORAS demo a month before release faggot?

Also the X/Y demo at PAX West?

>>26482377
read >>>26482344

>>26482343
>>26482348
another B/W only new mons gen until endgame would be nice, 150+ new mons was great.

Also because only 70 new mons was a huge hate topic for X/Y

>>26482385
Because people want it, faggot.

>>26482406
read >>>26482385

>>26482397
I didnt mean why would they make many new pokemon but why would they reveal the number of new Pokemon already?

Thats ridiculous

>>26482427
They could mention "We know one of the biggest complaints of X/Y was it was the first gen to introduce under 100 new Pokemon, and we're please to announce that won't be the case again, we hope you look forward to catching and training the 100+ new pokemon available in Sun and Moon"

>>26482446
Lol GF admits no wrongs ever

>>26482335
Hell at this point I will settle for 50 new mons, not counting megas.

>>26482555
Get out GF shill, no one is settling for that.

Stop being lazy and get to designing and modeling you lazy fucks.

>>26482397
A lot of people complained about only being able to use new mons in BW too.

>>26482591
I didn't because you could always trade for em or cheat em in.

Also Gen 5 has some of the best designs in my opinion barring starters(Serperior was decent)

I want them to turn all HMs into regular TMs
and not make you need them to progress through the game.

I want to see all new mons that aren't prevos or megas.

I want the pokes stat screen to also display IV and EV.

I want a new eveelution.

And I want to see good final evos on all three of the starters.

>>26482397
I'd be in favor of new pokes if I didn't feel like they'd all have God-tier stats and throw the balance of the game.

>>26482525
HE'S A GOOD GAME COMPANY HE DINDU NUFFIN

>>26482718
>throw the balance of the game.

kek

>>26482718
Gen 6 mons were fucking trash bar legends.

Most of the meta changes came from megas and new new formes for older mons,

>>26482344
To fuel the hype train of course.
And everyone will think it'll be the best game of the century, as they did with the VC relase of RBY.

>>26482763
>fuel the hype train
demos do the exact opposite

>>26482742
I'm talking about BW, anon.

>>26482774
Gen 5 mons were bretty gud, but is there any proof a bunch of Gen 7's would be after Gen 6 mons being raw sewage?

They gave us a fucking weak ass mono dragon psuedo after introducing a fucking dragon killer type.

>>26482791
How many of gen 4's non-legendaries are worth using?

>>26482880
Garchomp
Infernape
Lopunny
Garchomp
Lucario
Magnezone
Weavile
Togekiss
Gliscor
Gallade
Rotom

A lot.

>>26482912
Lopunny was shit before its mega.

>>26482934
It's not shit now.

Also Staraptor used to be good if you want good ignoring new gens.

Even tankier Mega Scrafty or Fast Mega Malamar so I can keep Checkin dem boys.

File: Untitled.png (178KB, 618x311px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 618x311px

>>26482343
>>26482427
They revealed the number early in Black and White's promotional materials.

In fact, they don't normally give us exact numbers (except for Gen II's pre-release, I believe) but they do normally give us a ball park of how many Pokemon to expect. To my knowledge, X/Y were the only time they didn't brag about having "over ___ new Pokemon!", and that's only because they must've known that 70 ain't no number to brag about. I'd be more worried if we DIDN'T get a rough number in the next 1-2 trailers, because that'd imply we're getting a low number