>roothoot appears solely on 4chan >roothoot was real >ballio,

>>26416566
You need to try harder, anon. You forgot to actually put bait on the end of your hook.

k

WHERE'S THE FUCKING CONFLAGUAR PORN.

>>26416566
Root hoot wasn't real.

There was a trademark registered implying that there would be a grass type owl Pokemon.

Someone saw this and designed a grass owl off of it.

An autist spammed this all over /vp/, claiming it was real.

That's it.

Roothoot wasn't real you fucking dimwit

>>26416566
>You guys are gonna look like scrubs come June 2nd

Do you think they will show the last evos? cause they won't.

>>26416636
>There was a trademark registered implying that there would be a grass type owl Pokemon.
>Someone saw this and designed a grass owl off of it.
I'm not saying Roothoot was real because it isn't/wasn't, but those designs leaked on here a month before the trademarks were found, so someone finding them before a Twitter bot whose sole purpose is to Tweet about trademarks would be really fucking impressive. But even if that were the case, the artist behind those three clearly doesn't know what a cat and sea lion look like.

>>26416566
>You guys are gonna look like scrubs come June 2nd
We just got the reveal of the starters and the first real gameplay footage last week, do you seriously think they'd show us the final evolutions before they show us the middle stages? If so than you are a fucking idiot.

>>26416636
the roothoot pic appeared waaaaaay before the trademark names were registered

>>26416605
>wanting to see porn of a literal panther with some red stripes

File: image.gif (1MB, 205x172px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 205x172px

>>26416722
So did Cactowl

Cactowl isn't real either

I'll never understand Roothootfags

>>26416566
>Roothoot was real

LMFAO

>Roothoot
>real
okay then

>>26416738
But just look at her ass.

File: 346.png (63KB, 774x306px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 774x306px

>Roothoot fags (mostly trolls) are still pretending the other two never existed.

All three were fake and gay.

File: costanza.png (299KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 500x375px

>>26416566

>roothoot was real

>>26416989
>grass owl, fire cat, water seel

They were all real

>>26416699
One, it wasn't that long.
Two, it's entirely possible someone spotted it before anyone else. Also a Twitter bot isn't perfect by any means, it often picks up info late.
Three, if that's not the case the coincidence option is still there especially since the only resemblance root hoot has to Rowley is that they're owls
Four, Cubble and Finpip are completely fake.

>>26417121

How the fuck is that a seal and how the FUCK is that a cat?

>>26417121
Do you need some baiting lessons?

They are too edgy to be real. One of them would be believable but not two super edgy psssh nothing personnel kid final forms

FAKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: trs;;u.png (142KB, 401x300px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 401x300px

>>26417121
>rock abomination
>cat

File: laugh.png (151KB, 499x473px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 499x473px

>>26416807

>>26416699

That's true, but no one really paid it any mind until the trademarks were brought up

I was there when Roothoot was first posted and there were plenty of people saying it was cute and defending its shoddy design. I should have known right then and there what this was going to turn into but I'm still surprised by its prevalence on this board.

The redraw of Roothoot (I.e, fanart of fanart) was undoubtedly better than the original and I clearly remember people trying to say the first one sucked so bad because someone had just drawn it from memory. While its definitely possible for someone working behind the scenes on these games to be an awful artist, the picture wasn't presented as such. It had the angle, the cropping and the quality of a supposed leak. That alone should have tipped everyone off right then and there. Even more so when the abominations dubbed Cubble and Finpup emerged. Roothootfags argue that they were never presented as a trio, which is true, and I'd say they weren't drawn by the same person either. The latter two are slightly better designed, though not by much. Honestly if Roothoot's face wasn't so fucked up it wouldn't have been a bad fakemon.

What REALLY gets me though is that after the trademarks were discovered and a grass owl was pretty much confirmed, everyone latched onto it even harder. Despite all the common sense that would dictate it as a fake, they still believed it would be real. And when it wasn't, there was suddenly a difference between Owlfags and Roothootfags, the original picture was just concept art and, perhaps worst of all, its the second stage evo. As if in any world, no matter how ass backwards, Owlet would evolve into Roothoot. This was the point where I lost my shit with the whole situation and I personally cannot wait for Roothootfags to have no more hopes left when everything is officially revealed.

Is it just autistic trolling? Perhaps. Or perhaps these people truly believe what they've been saying over the last two and a half months. Either way, I just want Roothoot to die once and for all.

>>26416566
Literally what

>>26416566
>Roothot was real
Literally kill yourself my man